These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25992466)
1. Evaluating the climate benefits of CO2-enhanced oil recovery using life cycle analysis. Cooney G; Littlefield J; Marriott J; Skone TJ Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 49(12):7491-500. PubMed ID: 25992466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Techno-Economic Assessment and Life Cycle Assessment of CO Abuov Y; Serik G; Lee W Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Jun; 56(12):8571-8580. PubMed ID: 35653301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Life cycle inventory of CO2 in an enhanced oil recovery system. Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; McCoy ST Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Nov; 43(21):8027-32. PubMed ID: 19924918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization from ammonia process in Mexico. Morales Mora MA; Vergara CP; Leiva MA; Martínez Delgadillo SA; Rosa-Domínguez ER J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183(Pt 3):998-1008. PubMed ID: 27692511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Well-to-Wheels Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Canadian Oil Sands Products: Implications for U.S. Petroleum Fuels. Cai H; Brandt AR; Yeh S; Englander JG; Han J; Elgowainy A; Wang MQ Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 49(13):8219-27. PubMed ID: 26054375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mitigation of global greenhouse gas emissions from waste: conclusions and strategies from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Report. Working Group III (Mitigation). Bogner J; Pipatti R; Hashimoto S; Diaz C; Mareckova K; Diaz L; Kjeldsen P; Monni S; Faaij A; Gao Q; Zhang T; Ahmed MA; Sutamihardja RT; Gregory R; Waste Manag Res; 2008 Feb; 26(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 18338699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas emission intensity of petroleum products at U.S. refineries. Elgowainy A; Han J; Cai H; Wang M; Forman GS; DiVita VB Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(13):7612-24. PubMed ID: 24869918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can Producing Oil Store Carbon? Greenhouse Gas Footprint of CO2EOR, Offshore North Sea. Stewart RJ; Haszeldine RS Environ Sci Technol; 2015 May; 49(9):5788-95. PubMed ID: 25789442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Market-driven emissions from recovery of carbon dioxide gas. Supekar SD; Skerlos SJ Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Dec; 48(24):14615-23. PubMed ID: 25412142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Integration of non-fuel coproducts into the GREET model. Forman GS; Unnasch S Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(7):4372-80. PubMed ID: 25710605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Technologies to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions at North American Refineries. Motazedi K; Abella JP; Bergerson JA Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Feb; 51(3):1918-1928. PubMed ID: 28001370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproducibility of LCA models of crude oil production. Vafi K; Brandt AR Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Nov; 48(21):12978-85. PubMed ID: 25279438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra-Low Carbon Emissions from Coal-Fired Power Plants through Bio-Oil Co-Firing and Biochar Sequestration. Dang Q; Mba Wright M; Brown RC Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Dec; 49(24):14688-95. PubMed ID: 26545153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Life Cycle Analysis of Electrofuels: Fischer-Tropsch Fuel Production from Hydrogen and Corn Ethanol Byproduct CO Zang G; Sun P; Elgowainy A; Bafana A; Wang M Environ Sci Technol; 2021 Mar; 55(6):3888-3897. PubMed ID: 33661618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing primary energy attributed to renewable energy with primary energy equivalent to determine carbon abatement in a national context. Gallachóir BP; O'Leary F; Bazilian M; Howley M; McKeogh EJ J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(5):923-37. PubMed ID: 16702067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soil respiration contributes substantially to urban carbon fluxes in the greater Boston area. Decina SM; Hutyra LR; Gately CK; Getson JM; Reinmann AB; Short Gianotti AG; Templer PH Environ Pollut; 2016 May; 212():433-439. PubMed ID: 26914093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Model to investigate energy and greenhouse gas emissions implications of refining petroleum: impacts of crude quality and refinery configuration. Abella JP; Bergerson JA Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Dec; 46(24):13037-47. PubMed ID: 23013493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. U.S. refinery efficiency: impacts analysis and implications for fuel carbon policy implementation. Forman GS; Divita VB; Han J; Cai H; Elgowainy A; Wang M Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Jul; 48(13):7625-33. PubMed ID: 24870020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reducing CO2 emissions and energy consumption of heat-integrated distillation systems. Gadalla MA; Olujic Z; Jansens PJ; Jobson M; Smith R Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Sep; 39(17):6860-70. PubMed ID: 16190250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns in CH4 and CO2 concentrations across boreal rivers: Major drivers and implications for fluvial greenhouse emissions under climate change scenarios. Campeau A; Del Giorgio PA Glob Chang Biol; 2014 Apr; 20(4):1075-88. PubMed ID: 24273093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]