179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25992988)
1. A digital volumetric tomography (DVT) study in the mandibular molar region for miniscrew placement during mixed dentition.
Bhattad MS; Baliga S; Vibhute P
Dental Press J Orthod; 2015; 20(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 25992988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of safe zone in maxillary molar region for miniscrew placement in the mixed dentition period--a digital volumetric tomographic (DVT) study.
Hotwani K; Baliga S; Thosar N; Sharma K
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(3):39-42. PubMed ID: 25745723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Anatomic assessment of the mandibular buccal shelf for miniscrew insertion in white patients.
Elshebiny T; Palomo JM; Baumgaertel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):505-511. PubMed ID: 29602342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites.
Farnsworth D; Rossouw PE; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4):495-503. PubMed ID: 21457860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-dimensional evaluation of interradicular spaces and cortical bone thickness for the placement and initial stability of microimplants in adults.
Park J; Cho HJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Sep; 136(3):314.e1-12; discussion 314-5. PubMed ID: 19732658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Buccal cortical bone thickness at miniscrew placement sites in patients with different vertical skeletal patterns.
Veli I; Uysal T; Baysal A; Karadede I
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Nov; 75(6):417-29. PubMed ID: 25344123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bone and cortical bone thickness of mandibular buccal shelf for mini-screw insertion in adults.
Nucera R; Lo Giudice A; Bellocchio AM; Spinuzza P; Caprioglio A; Perillo L; Matarese G; Cordasco G
Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):745-751. PubMed ID: 28598220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal sites for orthodontic mini-implant placement assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
Fayed MM; Pazera P; Katsaros C
Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep; 80(5):939-51. PubMed ID: 20578867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Co-axial computed tomography for optimizing orthodontic miniscrew implant size and site of placement.
Bhalla K; Kalha AS
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(1):33-5. PubMed ID: 23729136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preliminary cone-beam computed tomography study evaluating dental and skeletal changes after treatment with a mandibular Schwarz appliance.
Tai K; Hotokezaka H; Park JH; Tai H; Miyajima K; Choi M; Kai LM; Mishima K
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):262.e1-262.e11; discussion 262-3. PubMed ID: 20816294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative evaluation of maxillary interradicular bone with cone-beam computed tomography for bicortical placement of orthodontic mini-implants.
Yang L; Li F; Cao M; Chen H; Wang X; Chen X; Yang L; Gao W; Petrone JF; Ding Y
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):725-37. PubMed ID: 26038077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone dimensions in the posterior mandible: a retrospective radiographic study using cone beam computed tomography. Part 1--analysis of dentate sites.
Braut V; Bornstein MM; Lauber R; Buser D
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Apr; 32(2):175-84. PubMed ID: 22292147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics.
Silvestrini Biavati A; Tecco S; Migliorati M; Festa F; Panza G; Marzo G; Gherlone E; Tetè S
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 May; 14(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 21457458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computed tomographic analysis of tooth-bearing alveolar bone for orthodontic miniscrew placement.
Lee KJ; Joo E; Kim KD; Lee JS; Park YC; Yu HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Apr; 135(4):486-94. PubMed ID: 19361735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Simulation of miniscrew-root distance available for molar distalization depending on the miniscrew insertion angle and vertical facial type.
Yoon JH; Cha JY; Choi YJ; Park WS; Han SS; Lee KJ
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239759. PubMed ID: 32970759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Palatal bone thickness compared with cone-beam computed tomography in adolescents and adults for mini-implant placement.
Ryu JH; Park JH; Vu Thi Thu T; Bayome M; Kim Y; Kook YA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 22858330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bone density and miniscrew stability in orthodontic patients.
Samrit V; Kharbanda OP; Duggal R; Seith A; Malhotra V
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):204-12. PubMed ID: 23304969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "Safe zones": a guide for miniscrew positioning in the maxillary and mandibular arch.
Poggio PM; Incorvati C; Velo S; Carano A
Angle Orthod; 2006 Mar; 76(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16539541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants.
Deguchi T; Nasu M; Murakami K; Yabuuchi T; Kamioka H; Takano-Yamamoto T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jun; 129(6):721.e7-12. PubMed ID: 16769488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of miniscrew surgical guides assessed from cone-beam computed tomography and digital models.
Bae MJ; Kim JY; Park JT; Cha JY; Kim HJ; Yu HS; Hwang CJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Jun; 143(6):893-901. PubMed ID: 23726340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
