183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25993250)
1. Dentoskeletal effects of a temporary skeletal anchorage device-supported rapid maxillary expansion appliance (TSADRME): A pilot study.
Vassar JW; Karydis A; Trojan T; Fisher J
Angle Orthod; 2016 Mar; 86(2):241-9. PubMed ID: 25993250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.
Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Drescher D
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal effects to the maxilla after rapid maxillary expansion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
Garrett BJ; Caruso JM; Rungcharassaeng K; Farrage JR; Kim JS; Taylor GD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 18617096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distalization of maxillary molars using temporary skeletal anchorage devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bayome M; Park JH; Bay C; Kook YA
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2021 Mar; 24 Suppl 1():103-112. PubMed ID: 33484608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion.
Rungcharassaeng K; Caruso JM; Kan JY; Kim J; Taylor G
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):428.e1-8. PubMed ID: 17920493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of changes in the naso-maxillary complex associated with two types of maxillary expanders.
Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Wine P; Haughey M; Pajtas B; Kaczynski R
Angle Orthod; 2012 May; 82(3):448-57. PubMed ID: 22032536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of bonded rapid palatal expansion on the transverse dimensions of the maxilla: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Christie KF; Boucher N; Chung CH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Apr; 137(4 Suppl):S79-85. PubMed ID: 20381765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effects on the maxillary dentoskeletal complex.
Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):748-57. PubMed ID: 25432256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion. An evaluation of different surgical techniques and their effect on maxillary dentoskeletal complex based on cone-beam computed tomography. Preliminary report].
Sygouros A; Motro M; Ugurlu F; Acar A
Orthod Fr; 2014 Jun; 85(2):175-87. PubMed ID: 24923217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of short-term effects of mini-implant-supported maxillary expansion appliance with two conventional expansion protocols.
Yılmaz A; Arman-Özçırpıcı A; Erken S; Polat-Özsoy Ö
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Oct; 37(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 25564504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional evaluation of surgically assisted implant bone-borne rapid maxillary expansion: a pilot study.
Tausche E; Hansen L; Hietschold V; Lagravère MO; Harzer W
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Apr; 131(4 Suppl):S92-9. PubMed ID: 17448393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transverse, vertical, and anterior-posterior changes between tooth-anchored versus Dresden bone-anchored rapid maxillary expansion 6 months post-expansion: A CBCT randomized controlled clinical trial.
Lagravère MO; Ling CP; Woo J; Harzer W; Major PW; Carey JP
Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 32057733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar.
Cozzani M; Rosa M; Cozzani P; Siciliani G
Prog Orthod; 2003; 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 12887575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Transverse, vertical, and anteroposterior changes from bone-anchored maxillary expansion vs traditional rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial.
Lagravère MO; Carey J; Heo G; Toogood RW; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):304.e1-12; discussion 304-5. PubMed ID: 20197161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoskeletal effects of 3 maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
Figueiredo DS; Bartolomeo FU; Romualdo CR; Palomo JM; Horta MC; Andrade I; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jul; 146(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 24975001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of dental and dentoalveolar changes between rapid palatal expansion and nickel-titanium palatal expansion appliances.
Ciambotti C; Ngan P; Durkee M; Kohli K; Kim H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jan; 119(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 11174532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the rapid and slow maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography: a randomized clinical trial.
Pereira JDS; Jacob HB; Locks A; Brunetto M; Ribeiro GLU
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):61-68. PubMed ID: 28658357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Zygomaticomaxillary modifications in the horizontal plane induced by micro-implant-supported skeletal expander, analyzed with CBCT images.
Cantarella D; Dominguez-Mompell R; Moschik C; Sfogliano L; Elkenawy I; Pan HC; Mallya SM; Moon W
Prog Orthod; 2018 Oct; 19(1):41. PubMed ID: 30345476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 2: The effects of maxillary molar root uprighting bends.
Byloff FK; Darendeliler MA; Clar E; Darendeliler A
Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(4):261-70. PubMed ID: 9267574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of transverse changes during maxillary expansion with 4-point bone-borne and tooth-borne maxillary expanders.
Mosleh MI; Kaddah MA; Abd ElSayed FA; ElSayed HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 26432315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
