These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25993937)

  • 1. UK slack on misconduct reports.
    Gibney E
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7552):271. PubMed ID: 25993937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publish or perish.
    Nature; 2015 May; 521(7552):259. PubMed ID: 25993920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Integrity in science: misconduct investigations in a U.S. university.
    Dale ML
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():283-95. PubMed ID: 9857312
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scientific misconduct: ORI survey is flawed.
    Teitelbaum SL
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739-40. PubMed ID: 12490917
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific misconduct is worryingly prevalent in the UK, shows BMJ survey.
    Tavare A
    BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():e377. PubMed ID: 22240276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Scientific misconduct: the state's role has limits.
    Korn D
    Nature; 2002 Dec 19-26; 420(6917):739. PubMed ID: 12490916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific misconduct. Wellcome rules widen the net.
    Koenig R
    Science; 2001 Aug; 293(5534):1411. PubMed ID: 11520955
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Research Councils UK issues tougher guidelines on research conduct.
    Watts G
    BMJ; 2013 Mar; 346():f1565. PubMed ID: 23476059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Academic misconduct and detection.
    Wood BD
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(3):276-9. PubMed ID: 20051600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Soft responses to misconduct.
    Nature; 2002 Nov; 420(6913):253. PubMed ID: 12447400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Introduction to misconduct in science and scientific duties.
    Soskolne CL
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1993; 3 Suppl 1():245-51. PubMed ID: 9857308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Academics draft protocol for handling research misconduct.
    White C
    BMJ; 2008 Sep; 337():a1612. PubMed ID: 18786968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Solutions, not scapegoats.
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):957. PubMed ID: 18563095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Scientific misconduct. Michigan gets an expensive lesson.
    Anderson C
    Science; 1993 Oct; 262(5130):23. PubMed ID: 8211122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientists behaving badly.
    Martinson BC; Anderson MS; de Vries R
    Nature; 2005 Jun; 435(7043):737-8. PubMed ID: 15944677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liverpool University suspends professor for alleged research misconduct.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2011 Oct; 343():d6712. PubMed ID: 22006954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Repairing research integrity.
    Titus SL; Wells JA; Rhoades LJ
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7198):980-2. PubMed ID: 18563131
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Storage of research data: why, how, where?
    Thomas SP
    Nurs Res; 1992; 41(5):309-11. PubMed ID: 1523114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Research misconduct: Speed translation of misconduct reports.
    Hartgerink CH
    Nature; 2015 Jun; 522(7557):419. PubMed ID: 26108842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.