These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25994176)
1. Visual Inspection for Caries Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gimenez T; Piovesan C; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Deery C; Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Mendes FM J Dent Res; 2015 Jul; 94(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 25994176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can we trust visual methods alone for detecting caries in teeth? Hoskin ER; Keenan AV Evid Based Dent; 2016 Jun; 17(2):41-2. PubMed ID: 27339234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluorescence-based methods for detecting caries lesions: systematic review, meta-analysis and sources of heterogeneity. Gimenez T; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Deery C; Ricketts DN; Mendes FM PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60421. PubMed ID: 23593215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. What is the most accurate method for detecting caries lesions? A systematic review. Gimenez T; Tedesco TK; Janoian F; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Deery C; Ricketts DNJ; Ekstrand KR; Mendes FM Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2021 Jun; 49(3):216-224. PubMed ID: 33847007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical relevance of studies on the accuracy of visual inspection for detecting caries lesions: a systematic review. Gimenez T; Piovesan C; Braga MM; Raggio DP; Deery C; Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Mendes FM Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 25571967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting Secondary Caries Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Brouwer F; Askar H; Paris S; Schwendicke F J Dent Res; 2016 Feb; 95(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 26464398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical performance of fluorescence-based methods for detection of occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth. Pontes LRA; Novaes TF; Moro BLP; Braga MM; Mendes FM Braz Oral Res; 2017 Nov; 31():e91. PubMed ID: 29116301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of dental radiographs for caries detection. Keenan JR; Keenan AV Evid Based Dent; 2016 Jun; 17(2):43. PubMed ID: 27339235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro performance of methods of approximal caries detection in primary molars. Braga MM; Morais CC; Nakama RC; Leamari VM; Siqueira WL; Mendes FM Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e35-41. PubMed ID: 19778733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laser fluorescence of caries detection in permanent teeth in vitro: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rosa MI; Schambeck VS; Dondossola ER; Alexandre MC; Tuon L; Grande AJ; Hugo F J Evid Based Med; 2016 Nov; 9(4):213-224. PubMed ID: 27792279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do undergraduate dental students perform well detecting and staging caries and assessing activity by visual examination? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Turchiello RZ; Pedrotti D; Braga MM; Rocha RO; Rodrigues JA; Lenzi TL Int J Paediatr Dent; 2019 May; 29(3):281-293. PubMed ID: 30620110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of the discomfort reported by children on the performance of approximal caries detection methods. Novaes TF; Matos R; Raggio DP; Imparato JC; Braga MM; Mendes FM Caries Res; 2010; 44(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 20861630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance of fluorescence-based and conventional methods of occlusal caries detection in primary molars - an in vitro study. Novaes TF; Matos R; Gimenez T; Braga MM; DE Benedetto MS; Mendes FM Int J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Nov; 22(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 22276618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of high-powered magnification to detect occlusal caries in primary teeth. Mendes FM; Ganzerla E; Nunes AF; Puig AV; Imparato JC Am J Dent; 2006 Feb; 19(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 16555652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Lussi A; Francescut P Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):2-7. PubMed ID: 12566632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of contact points on the performance of caries detection methods in approximal surfaces of primary molars: an in vivo study. Ribeiro AA; Purger F; Rodrigues JA; Oliveira PR; Lussi A; Monteiro AH; Alves HD; Assis JT; Vasconcellos AB Caries Res; 2015; 49(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 25572115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in vitro comparison of detection methods for approximal carious lesions in primary molars. Chawla N; Messer LB; Adams GG; Manton DJ Caries Res; 2012; 46(2):161-9. PubMed ID: 22508449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In vitro performance of QLF system and conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries around tooth-colored restorations in primary molars. Lenzi TL; Piovesan C; Mendes FM; Braga MM; Raggio DP Int J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Jan; 26(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 25604208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Influence of Cognitive Bias on Caries Lesion Detection in Preschool Children. Moro BLP; Novaes TF; Pontes LRA; Gimenez T; Lara JS; Raggio DP; Braga MM; Mendes FM Caries Res; 2018; 52(5):420-428. PubMed ID: 29566393 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]