104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599462)
1. Comparison of repeat smear, colposcopy, and colposcopically directed biopsy in the evaluation of the mildly abnormal smear.
Maggi R; Zannoni E; Giorda G; Biraghi P; Sideri M
Gynecol Oncol; 1989 Dec; 35(3):294-6. PubMed ID: 2599462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Appraisal of the modalities used to evaluate an initial abnormal Papanicolaou smear.
Higgins RV; Hall JB; McGee JA; Laurent S; Alvarez RD; Partridge EE
Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 8041525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the reliability of repeat cervical smears and colposcopy in patients with abnormal cervical cytology.
Mayeaux EJ; Harper MB; Abreo F; Pope JB; Phillips GS
J Fam Pract; 1995 Jan; 40(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 7807039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papillomavirus infection: punch biopsy versus cervical smear.
Gitsch G; Reinthaller A; Tatra G; Breitenecker G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1991; 249(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 1665685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Value of repeat cytology at the time of colposcopy for the evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia on Papanicolaou smears.
Wheelock JB; Kaminski PF
J Reprod Med; 1989 Oct; 34(10):815-7. PubMed ID: 2795564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The value of cervical cytology in HIV-infected women.
Del Priore G; Maag T; Bhattacharya M; Garcia PM; Till M; Lurain JR
Gynecol Oncol; 1995 Mar; 56(3):395-8. PubMed ID: 7705674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical conization findings in women with dysplastic cervical cytology and normal colposcopy.
Ramirez EJ; Hernandez E; Miyazawa K
J Reprod Med; 1990 Apr; 35(4):359-61. PubMed ID: 2352226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Colposcopic-histologic results in 97 patients with mild dysplasia shown by Pap test].
Crescini C; Pezzica E; Artuso A; Comerio D; Reale D; Bonaldi A
Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Nov; 43(11):509-12. PubMed ID: 1784407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does mild atypia on a cervical smear warrant further investigation?
Walker EM; Dodgson J; Duncan ID
Lancet; 1986 Sep; 2(8508):672-3. PubMed ID: 2876144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Human papillomavirus detection in cervical lesions nondiagnostic for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with Papanicolaou smear, colposcopy, and occurrence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Nuovo GJ; Blanco JS; Leipzig S; Smith D
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jun; 75(6):1006-11. PubMed ID: 2160630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience.
Economos K; Perez Veridiano N; Delke I; Collado ML; Tancer ML
Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jun; 81(6):915-8. PubMed ID: 8497355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Follow-up Papanicolaou smear for cervical atypia: are we missing significant disease? A HARNET Study.
Slawson DC; Bennett JH; Herman JM
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):289-93. PubMed ID: 8454975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Atypical squamous cells in Papanicolaou smears.
Davis GL; Hernandez E; Davis JL; Miyazawa K
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Jan; 69(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 3540762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Discrepancy of cervical cytology and colposcopic biopsy: is cervical conization necessary?
McCord ML; Stovall TG; Summitt RL; Ling FW
Obstet Gynecol; 1991 May; 77(5):715-9. PubMed ID: 2014085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The value of repeat Pap smear at the time of initial colposcopy.
Spitzer M; Ryskin M; Chernys AE; Shifrin A
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 9345348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Colposcopic evaluation after a repeat atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) smear.
Gerber S; De Grandi P; Petignat P; Mihaescu A; Delaloye JF
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Dec; 75(3):251-5. PubMed ID: 11728485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Koilocytotic atypia and underlying dysplasia.
Shepherd J; Lynch W
J Fam Pract; 1991 Aug; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 1890397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Atypical cervix uteri smears--consequences?].
Nielsen MN; Hølund B; Nielsen B; Ejersbo D; Holm K
Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 May; 158(21):2985-6. PubMed ID: 8686036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards a more rational policy for colposcopy.
Camilleri-Ferrante C; Camilleri AP
Public Health; 1992 Sep; 106(5):401-4. PubMed ID: 1410226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
