482 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25994643)
1. Robotic radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer: current perspectives.
Canda AE; Balbay MD
Asian J Androl; 2015; 17(6):908-15; discussion 913. PubMed ID: 25994643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of perioperative, functional, and oncologic outcomes between standard laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Huang X; Wang L; Zheng X; Wang X
Surg Endosc; 2017 Mar; 31(3):1045-1060. PubMed ID: 27444830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series.
Papachristos A; Basto M; Te Marvelde L; Moon D
ANZ J Surg; 2015 Mar; 85(3):154-8. PubMed ID: 24730750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is the learning curve of the urology resident for conventional radical prostatectomy similar to that of staff initiating robot-assisted radical prostatectomy?
Pires RDS; Pereira CWA; Favorito LA
Int Braz J Urol; 2024; 50(3):335-345. PubMed ID: 38446904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.
Akand M; Erdogru T; Avci E; Ates M
Int J Urol; 2015 Oct; 22(10):916-21. PubMed ID: 26212891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review.
Yuh B; Artibani W; Heidenreich A; Kimm S; Menon M; Novara G; Tewari A; Touijer K; Wilson T; Zorn KC; Eggener SE
Eur Urol; 2014 May; 65(5):918-27. PubMed ID: 23721959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy: comparison between initial robotic experience of a high-volume open surgeon and his contemporary open series.
Roscigno M; La Croce G; Naspro R; Nicolai M; Manica M; Scarcello M; Chinaglia D; Da Pozzo LF
Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2019 Dec; 71(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 31144491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy cancer control.
Hu JC; Gandaglia G; Karakiewicz PI; Nguyen PL; Trinh QD; Shih YC; Abdollah F; Chamie K; Wright JL; Ganz PA; Sun M
Eur Urol; 2014 Oct; 66(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 24602934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy versus standard laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes.
Carbonara U; Srinath M; Crocerossa F; Ferro M; Cantiello F; Lucarelli G; Porpiglia F; Battaglia M; Ditonno P; Autorino R
World J Urol; 2021 Oct; 39(10):3721-3732. PubMed ID: 33843016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive factors for immediate continence after radical prostatectomy.
Hatiboglu G; Teber D; Tichy D; Pahernik S; Hadaschik B; Nyarangi-Dix J; Hohenfellner M
World J Urol; 2016 Jan; 34(1):113-20. PubMed ID: 25991601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can We Accomplish Better Oncological Results with Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy?
Kural AR; Obek C; Doganca T
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S54-S58. PubMed ID: 28075160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative analysis of oncologic outcomes for open vs. robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer.
Lee D; Choi SK; Park J; Shim M; Kim A; Lee S; Song C; Ahn H
Korean J Urol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):572-9. PubMed ID: 26279826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
McGinley KF; Sun X; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Cooperberg MR; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2016 Mar; 23(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 26667212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Early outcomes of single-port robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: lessons learned from the learning-curve experience.
Covas Moschovas M; Bhat S; Onol F; Rogers T; Patel V
BJU Int; 2021 Jan; 127(1):114-121. PubMed ID: 32623822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy - review of the literature concerning oncological and functional outcome of patients].
Gilfrich C; Brookman-May S; May M; Lebentrau S
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 Nov; 45(6):471-85; quiz 486-7. PubMed ID: 25514779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Single- versus dual-console robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact on intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in a teaching institution.
Morgan MS; Shakir NA; Garcia-Gil M; Ozayar A; Gahan JC; Friedlander JI; Roehrborn CG; Cadeddu JA
World J Urol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):781-6. PubMed ID: 24973046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New surgical approaches for clinically high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer.
Dell'Oglio P; Stabile A; Gandaglia G; Zaffuto E; Fossati N; Bandini M; Suardi N; Karakiewicz PI; Shariat SF; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1013-1031. PubMed ID: 28862047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of prostate gland weight on the surgical and oncological outcomes of extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Kim MS; Jang WS; Chung DY; Koh DH; Lee JS; Goh HJ; Choi YD
BMC Urol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 30606182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
