143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25994710)
1. Expectations and speech intelligibility.
Babel M; Russell J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 May; 137(5):2823-33. PubMed ID: 25994710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reduced efficiency of audiovisual integration for nonnative speech.
Yi HG; Phelps JE; Smiljanic R; Chandrasekaran B
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL387-93. PubMed ID: 24181980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of visual speech information on the intelligibility of English consonants produced by non-native speakers.
Kawase S; Hannah B; Wang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1352. PubMed ID: 25190408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Information-bearing acoustic change outperforms duration in predicting intelligibility of full-spectrum and noise-vocoded sentences.
Stilp CE
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1518-29. PubMed ID: 24606287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of noise and talker intelligibility on judgments of accentedness.
Gittleman S; Van Engen KJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):3138. PubMed ID: 29857746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perception of contrastive bi-syllabic lexical stress in unaccented and accented words by younger and older listeners.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Pickett EJ; Fitzgibbons PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1132-48. PubMed ID: 27036250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.
Pinet M; Iverson P; Huckvale M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1653-62. PubMed ID: 21895102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Processing Relationships Between Language-Being-Spoken and Other Speech Dimensions in Monolingual and Bilingual Listeners.
Vaughn CR; Bradlow AR
Lang Speech; 2017 Dec; 60(4):530-561. PubMed ID: 29216813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the perceptual contributions of vowels and consonants to Mandarin sentence intelligibility.
Chen F; Wong LL; Wong EY
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):EL178-84. PubMed ID: 23927222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A relationship between processing speech in noise and dysarthric speech.
Borrie SA; Baese-Berk M; Van Engen K; Bent T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4660. PubMed ID: 28679257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of linear and nonlinear speech rate changes on speech intelligibility in stationary and fluctuating maskers.
Cooke M; Aubanel V
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jun; 141(6):4126. PubMed ID: 28618803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pure linguistic interference during comprehension of competing speech signals.
Dai B; McQueen JM; Hagoort P; Kösem A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL249. PubMed ID: 28372048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring effectiveness of semantic cues in degraded English sentences in non-native listeners.
Shi LF
Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):30-9. PubMed ID: 24003982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Talker- and language-specific effects on speech intelligibility in noise assessed with bilingual talkers: Which language is more robust against noise and reverberation?
Hochmuth S; Jürgens T; Brand T; Kollmeier B
Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():23-34. PubMed ID: 26486466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Speech intelligibility of virtual humans.
Devesse A; Dudek A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):908-916. PubMed ID: 30261770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can older adults enhance the intelligibility of their speech?
Smiljanic R
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Feb; 133(2):EL129-35. PubMed ID: 23363193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of speech modification on non-native listeners for matrix-style sentences.
Cooke M; García Lecumberri ML; Tang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Feb; 137(2):EL151-7. PubMed ID: 25698043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The role of linguistic and indexical information in improved recognition of dysarthric speech.
Borrie SA; McAuliffe MJ; Liss JM; O'Beirne GA; Anderson TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):474-82. PubMed ID: 23297919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
