These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25994839)

  • 1. Simulation of the mechanical interlocking capacity of a rough bone implant surface during healing.
    Halldin A; Ander M; Jacobsson M; Hansson S
    Biomed Eng Online; 2015 May; 14():45. PubMed ID: 25994839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analytical modeling of the interaction of an ultrasonic wave with a rough bone-implant interface.
    Hériveaux Y; Nguyen VH; Biwa S; Haïat G
    Ultrasonics; 2020 Dec; 108():106223. PubMed ID: 32771811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Debonding of coin-shaped osseointegrated implants: Coupling of experimental and numerical approaches.
    Hériveaux Y; Le Cann S; Immel K; Vennat E; Nguyen VH; Brailovski V; Karasinski P; Sauer RA; Haïat G
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 May; 141():105787. PubMed ID: 36989873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A nonlinear homogenized finite element analysis of the primary stability of the bone-implant interface.
    Ovesy M; Voumard B; Zysset P
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2018 Oct; 17(5):1471-1480. PubMed ID: 29858707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the coefficient of friction and tightening speed on the preload induced at the dental implant complex with the finite element method.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Geramipanah F; Safari H; Paknejad M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 May; 113(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 25749081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone-implant interface.
    Raffa ML; Nguyen VH; Haiat G
    Biomed Eng Online; 2019 Dec; 18(1):114. PubMed ID: 31796076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of implant/abutment connection on stress distribution to implant-surrounding bone: a finite element analysis.
    Hanaoka M; Gehrke SA; Mardegan F; Gennari CR; Taschieri S; Del Fabbro M; Corbella S
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Oct; 23(7):565-71. PubMed ID: 24750397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of push-in versus pull-out tests on bone-implant interfaces of rabbit tibia dental implant healing model.
    Seong WJ; Grami S; Jeong SC; Conrad HJ; Hodges JS
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):460-9. PubMed ID: 22172015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing the local mechanical environment in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy using finite element analysis.
    Pauchard Y; Ivanov TG; McErlain DD; Milner JS; Giffin JR; Birmingham TB; Holdsworth DW
    J Biomech Eng; 2015 Mar; 137(3):. PubMed ID: 25363041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of different mucosal resiliency and denture reline on stress distribution in peri-implant bone tissue during osseointegration. A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Bacchi A; Consani RL; Mesquita MF; dos Santos MB
    Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e833-7. PubMed ID: 21981046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnitude and direction of mechanical stress at the osseointegrated interface of the microthread implant.
    Hudieb MI; Wakabayashi N; Kasugai S
    J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21189091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant.
    Huang HL; Hsu JT; Fuh LJ; Lin DJ; Chen MY
    Comput Biol Med; 2010 May; 40(5):525-32. PubMed ID: 20385379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface.
    Cha JY; Pereira MD; Smith AA; Houschyar KS; Yin X; Mouraret S; Brunski JB; Helms JA
    J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3):482-90. PubMed ID: 25628271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stress analysis in simulation models with or without implant threads representation.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Barão VA; de Sousa EA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(6):1040-4. PubMed ID: 20162107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The removal of Al2O3 particles from grit-blasted titanium implant surfaces: effects on biocompatibility, osseointegration and interface strength in vivo.
    Rüger M; Gensior TJ; Herren C; von Walter M; Ocklenburg C; Marx R; Erli HJ
    Acta Biomater; 2010 Jul; 6(7):2852-61. PubMed ID: 20080212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis.
    Qian L; Todo M; Matsushita Y; Koyano K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):877-86. PubMed ID: 19865628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A histological and biomechanical study of bone stress and bone remodeling around immediately loaded implants.
    Han J; Hou J; Zhou G; Wang C; Fan Y
    Sci China Life Sci; 2014 Jun; 57(6):618-26. PubMed ID: 24824585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parameters of implant stability measurements based on resonance frequency and damping capacity: a comparative finite element analysis.
    Winter W; Möhrle S; Holst S; Karl M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):532-9. PubMed ID: 20556252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.