BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

462 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25995126)

  • 1. Mental health problems in young male offenders with and without sex offences: a comparison based on the MAYSI-2.
    Boonmann C; Nelson RJ; DiCataldo F; Jansen LM; Doreleijers TA; Vermeiren RR; Colins OF; Grisso T
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2016 Dec; 26(5):352-365. PubMed ID: 25995126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-second version and psychiatric disorders in youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions in Switzerland.
    Leenarts LE; Dölitzsch C; Schmeck K; Fegert JM; Grisso T; Schmid M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2016 Sep; 16(1):340. PubMed ID: 27716175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caution or warning? A validity study of the MAYSI-2 with juvenile offenders.
    McCoy H; Vaughn MG; Maynard BR; Salas-Wright CP
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(4):508-26. PubMed ID: 25060035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical utility and policy implications of a statewide mental health screening process for juvenile offenders.
    Stewart DG; Trupin EW
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Mar; 54(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 12610247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening for mental health needs of New Zealand youth in secure care facilities using the MAYSI-2.
    McArdle S; Lambie I
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2018 Jun; 28(3):239-254. PubMed ID: 29280509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Juvenile Sex Offenders.
    Ryan EP; Otonichar JM
    Curr Psychiatry Rep; 2016 Jul; 18(7):67. PubMed ID: 27222141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diagnostic performance and optimal cut-off scores of the Massachusetts youth screening instrument-second version in a sample of Swiss youths in welfare and juvenile justice institutions.
    Dölitzsch C; Leenarts LE; Schmeck K; Fegert JM; Grisso T; Schmid M
    BMC Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 17(1):61. PubMed ID: 28178977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The validity and clinical utility of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument--version 2 (MAYSI-2) in the UK.
    Lennox C; O'Malley K; Bell V; Shaw J; Dolan M
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2015 Jul; 25(3):207-19. PubMed ID: 25111074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex and race differences in mental health symptoms in juvenile justice: the MAYSI-2 national meta-analysis.
    Vincent GM; Grisso T; Terry A; Banks S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2008 Mar; 47(3):282-290. PubMed ID: 18216730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument to assess mental health problems in young people within an Australian youth detention centre.
    Stathis S; Letters P; Doolan I; Fleming R; Heath K; Arnett A; Cory S
    J Paediatr Child Health; 2008; 44(7-8):438-43. PubMed ID: 18564078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychiatric and Forensic Differences Between Men Charged with Sex Offences and Men Charged with Other Offences.
    Arbanas G; Marinović P; Buzina N
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):2042-2049. PubMed ID: 33180341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A statewide screening of mental health symptoms among juvenile offenders in detention.
    Cauffman E
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2004 Apr; 43(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 15187803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relating psychiatric disorders, offender and offence characteristics in a sample of adolescent sex offenders and non-sex offenders.
    Van Wijk AP; Blokland AA; Duits N; Vermeiren R; Harkink J
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2007; 17(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 17238148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Examining the sexual offenses of female juveniles: The relevance of childhood maltreatment.
    Roe-Sepowitz D; Krysik J
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 2008 Oct; 78(4):405-12. PubMed ID: 19123761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in Psychosexual Development Among Child, Peer, and Mixed Juvenile Sex Offenders.
    Lillard CM; Cooper-Lehki C; Fremouw WJ; DiSciullo VA
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):526-534. PubMed ID: 31532844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group sexual offending by juvenile females.
    Wijkman M; Weerman F; Bijleveld C; Hendriks J
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Jun; 27(3):335-56. PubMed ID: 25504258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The psychosocial characteristics of juvenile sexual offenders referred to an adolescent forensic service in the UK.
    Dolan M; Holloway J; Bailey S; Kroll L
    Med Sci Law; 1996 Oct; 36(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 8918113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validity of the Massachusetts Youth Screening Instrument-2 (MAYSI-2) scales in juvenile justice settings.
    Archer RP; Simonds-Bisbee EC; Spiegel DR; Handel RW; Elkins DE
    J Pers Assess; 2010 Jul; 92(4):337-48. PubMed ID: 20552508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What the MAYSI-2 Can Tell Us About Anger-Irritability and Trauma.
    McCoy H; Leverso J; Bowen EA
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2016 Apr; 60(5):555-74. PubMed ID: 25395475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is so special about male adolescent sexual offending? A review and test of explanations through meta-analysis.
    Seto MC; Lalumière ML
    Psychol Bull; 2010 Jul; 136(4):526-75. PubMed ID: 20565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.