These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

63 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599577)

  • 1. Effects of pretreatment sterilization and cleaning methods on materials properties and osseoinductivity of a threaded implant.
    Hartman LC; Meenaghan MA; Schaaf NG; Hawker PB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 2599577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Increased bone formation around coated implants.
    Stadlinger B; Bierbaum S; Grimmer S; Schulz MC; Kuhlisch E; Scharnweber D; Eckelt U; Mai R
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 19531092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bone response to plasma-cleaned titanium implants.
    Carlsson LV; Alberktsson T; Berman C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(3):199-204. PubMed ID: 2639120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
    Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biological and biomechanical evaluation of bone remodelling and implant stability after using an osteotome technique.
    Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Kersken J; Nienkemper M; Weyhrother Hv; Joos U; Meyer U
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 15642025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone regeneration in dehiscence-type defects at chemically modified (SLActive) and conventional SLA titanium implants: a pilot study in dogs.
    Schwarz F; Herten M; Sager M; Wieland M; Dard M; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 17137467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
    Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis of performance of root-form endosseous implants placed in the maxillary sinus.
    Boyne PJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1993; 3(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10146541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. In vivo low-density bone apposition on different implant surface materials.
    Braceras I; De Maeztu MA; Alava JI; Gay-Escoda C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 38(3):274-8. PubMed ID: 19200692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bone tissue responses to glass fiber-reinforced composite implants--a histomorphometric study.
    Ballo AM; Akca EA; Ozen T; Lassila L; Vallittu PK; Närhi TO
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 19515036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Composite morphology of the bone and associated support-tissue interfaces to osseointegrated dental implants: TEM and HVEM analyses.
    Steflik DE; Corpe RS; Lake FT; Sisk AL; Parr GR; Hanes PJ; Buttle K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):443-53. PubMed ID: 9274073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of 3 different endosseous nonsubmerged implants in edentulous mandibles: a clinical report.
    Røynesdal AK; Ambjørnsen E; Haanaes HR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):543-8. PubMed ID: 10453670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subcrestal placement of two-part implants.
    Welander M; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 19397633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
    Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted, large-grit and acid-etched implant surfaces at sites with coronal circumferential defects: an experimental study in dogs.
    Lai HC; Zhuang LF; Zhang ZY; Wieland M; Liu X
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):247-53. PubMed ID: 19397636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study.
    Schliephake H; Reiss G; Urban R; Neukam FW; Guckel S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1993; 8(5):502-11. PubMed ID: 8112789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Dahlin C; Sennerby L; Lekholm U; Linde A; Nyman S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1989; 4(1):19-25. PubMed ID: 2599578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone.
    Huang YH; Xiropaidis AV; Sorensen RG; Albandar JM; Hall J; Wikesjö UM
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Feb; 16(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 15642037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.