BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25996205)

  • 1. Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
    Douglas E; Wardle J; Massat NJ; Waller J
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 113(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 25996205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which demographic factors influence Pacific women's attendance at colposcopy clinics in New Zealand?
    McPherson G; Parmar P; Payne D; Fairbairn-Dunlop TP
    N Z Med J; 2021 Oct; 134(1543):69-78. PubMed ID: 34695078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
    MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
    Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
    HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing and piloting an intervention to reduce colposcopy non-attendance and corresponding inequalities: a mixed-methods study.
    Cowling A; Nevens L; Contogiorgi N; Bradley N; Wilcockson C; Stebbings C; McMeekin P; Steer M; Harland J
    Lancet; 2023 Nov; 402 Suppl 1():S35. PubMed ID: 37997076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who are the women who default from colposcopy clinics?
    Usha Kiran TS; Jayawickrama NS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 12521425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening programme?
    Whynes DK; Philips Z; Avis M
    J Health Econ; 2007 Mar; 26(2):306-25. PubMed ID: 17010459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audit of cervical cancer screening and colposcopy attendance in rural South Africa.
    Knegt Y
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2014 Dec; 18(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25854095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
    Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge of the cervical cancer screening process among rural and urban illinois women undergoing colposcopy.
    Massad LS; Verhulst SJ; Hagemeyer M; Brady P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 17012992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can default rates in colposcopy really be reduced?
    Balasubramani L; Orbell S; Hagger M; Brown V; Tidy J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 18190379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appraisal theory and emotional sequelae of first visit to colposcopy following an abnormal cervical screening result.
    Orbell S; Hagger M; Brown V; Tidy J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):533-55. PubMed ID: 15509360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colposcopy in the management of early cervical neoplasia.
    Herbeck G; Menken FC
    Endoscopy; 1977 Nov; 9(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 590215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the uptake of cervical screening programmes.
    Gannon M; Dowling M
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1280-4. PubMed ID: 19043332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to colposcopy in the State of São Paulo, Brazil: probabilistic linkage study of administrative data.
    Buss LF; Cury L; Ribeiro CM; Silva GAE; Eluf Neto J
    Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(1):e00304820. PubMed ID: 35043887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does improving communication and information for women increase attendance at colposcopy in an inner city clinic? A randomised controlled trial.
    Tomlinson A; Kyrgiou M; Paraskevaidis E; Kitchener H; Martin-Hirsch P
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 15285300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity level and process indicators of organised programmes for cervical cancer screening in Italy.
    Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):27-40. PubMed ID: 16937844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth outcomes following treatment for precancerous changes to the cervix: a population-based record linkage study.
    Reilly R; Paranjothy S; Beer H; Brooks CJ; Fielder HM; Lyons RA
    BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 21790951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.