These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25996205)

  • 1. Colposcopy attendance and deprivation: A retrospective analysis of 27,193 women in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme.
    Douglas E; Wardle J; Massat NJ; Waller J
    Br J Cancer; 2015 Jun; 113(1):119-22. PubMed ID: 25996205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which demographic factors influence Pacific women's attendance at colposcopy clinics in New Zealand?
    McPherson G; Parmar P; Payne D; Fairbairn-Dunlop TP
    N Z Med J; 2021 Oct; 134(1543):69-78. PubMed ID: 34695078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of media reporting of cervical cancer in a UK celebrity on a population-based cervical screening programme.
    MacArthur GJ; Wright M; Beer H; Paranjothy S
    J Med Screen; 2011; 18(4):204-9. PubMed ID: 22156146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
    Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
    HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Developing and piloting an intervention to reduce colposcopy non-attendance and corresponding inequalities: a mixed-methods study.
    Cowling A; Nevens L; Contogiorgi N; Bradley N; Wilcockson C; Stebbings C; McMeekin P; Steer M; Harland J
    Lancet; 2023 Nov; 402 Suppl 1():S35. PubMed ID: 37997076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who are the women who default from colposcopy clinics?
    Usha Kiran TS; Jayawickrama NS
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Sep; 22(5):537-9. PubMed ID: 12521425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why do women participate in the English cervical cancer screening programme?
    Whynes DK; Philips Z; Avis M
    J Health Econ; 2007 Mar; 26(2):306-25. PubMed ID: 17010459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audit of cervical cancer screening and colposcopy attendance in rural South Africa.
    Knegt Y
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2014 Dec; 18(4):70-8. PubMed ID: 25854095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective study of cervical screening in women under 25 years (2005-2009).
    Ali AA; Richardson D; Hill N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Apr; 287(4):765-9. PubMed ID: 23183714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Knowledge of the cervical cancer screening process among rural and urban illinois women undergoing colposcopy.
    Massad LS; Verhulst SJ; Hagemeyer M; Brady P
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Oct; 10(4):252-5. PubMed ID: 17012992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can default rates in colposcopy really be reduced?
    Balasubramani L; Orbell S; Hagger M; Brown V; Tidy J
    BJOG; 2008 Feb; 115(3):403-8. PubMed ID: 18190379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Appraisal theory and emotional sequelae of first visit to colposcopy following an abnormal cervical screening result.
    Orbell S; Hagger M; Brown V; Tidy J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2004 Nov; 9(Pt 4):533-55. PubMed ID: 15509360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colposcopy in the management of early cervical neoplasia.
    Herbeck G; Menken FC
    Endoscopy; 1977 Nov; 9(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 590215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing the uptake of cervical screening programmes.
    Gannon M; Dowling M
    Br J Nurs; 2008 Nov 13-26; 17(20):1280-4. PubMed ID: 19043332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Management of women with abnormal cervical cytology: treatment patterns and associated costs in England and Wales.
    Martin-Hirsch P; Rash B; Martin A; Standaert B
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 17378815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Access to colposcopy in the State of São Paulo, Brazil: probabilistic linkage study of administrative data.
    Buss LF; Cury L; Ribeiro CM; Silva GAE; Eluf Neto J
    Cad Saude Publica; 2022; 38(1):e00304820. PubMed ID: 35043887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does improving communication and information for women increase attendance at colposcopy in an inner city clinic? A randomised controlled trial.
    Tomlinson A; Kyrgiou M; Paraskevaidis E; Kitchener H; Martin-Hirsch P
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2004; 25(4):445-8. PubMed ID: 15285300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Activity level and process indicators of organised programmes for cervical cancer screening in Italy.
    Ronco G; Giubilato P; Naldoni C; Zorzi M; Anghinoni E; Scalisi A; Dalla Palma P; Zanier L; Federici A; Angeloni C; Prandini S; Maglietta R; Mancini E; Pizzuti R; Iossa A; Segnan N; Zappa M
    Epidemiol Prev; 2006; 30(1 Suppl 3):27-40. PubMed ID: 16937844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth outcomes following treatment for precancerous changes to the cervix: a population-based record linkage study.
    Reilly R; Paranjothy S; Beer H; Brooks CJ; Fielder HM; Lyons RA
    BJOG; 2012 Jan; 119(2):236-44. PubMed ID: 21790951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.