149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599662)
1. The effect of hand, sonic and ultrasonic instrumentation on the shape of curved root canals.
Tang MP; Stock CJ
Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):55-63. PubMed ID: 2599662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stereomicroscopic evaluation of canal shape following hand, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation.
Loushine RJ; Weller RN; Hartwell GR
J Endod; 1989 Sep; 15(9):417-21. PubMed ID: 2637335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Preparation of curved root canals using hand instruments and mechanical aids].
Hülsmann M; Bertzbach F
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Jun; 44(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 2630269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of two ultrasonic units in shaping simulated curved canals.
Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
J Endod; 1989 Oct; 15(10):457-62. PubMed ID: 2639937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison using macroradiography of canal shapes in teeth instrumented ultrasonically and by hand.
Ahmad M; Pitt Ford TR
J Endod; 1989 Aug; 15(8):339-44. PubMed ID: 2637324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An in vitro histological comparison of the step-back, sonic, and ultrasonic instrumentation techniques in small, curved root canals.
Reynolds MA; Madison S; Walton RE; Krell KV; Rittman BR
J Endod; 1987 Jul; 13(7):307-14. PubMed ID: 3481796
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro method for comparing the effects of different root canal preparation techniques on the shape of curved root canals.
Tang MP; Stock CJ
Int Endod J; 1989 Mar; 22(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 2599661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative study of seven instruments in shaping the root canal in vitro.
Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 10332246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of root canal morphology on canal shape following instrumentation using different techniques.
Nagy CD; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Verdes E; Szabó J
Int Endod J; 1997 Mar; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 10332247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [SEM studies on root canal preparation using ultrasound].
Beer R; Gängler P
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 May; 44(5):334-9. PubMed ID: 2639044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison between two ultrasonic units in shaping curved canals in teeth using macroradiography.
Ahmad M
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1991 Apr; 7(2):55-8. PubMed ID: 1782894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of sonic instrumentation on the apical preparation of curved canals.
Ehrlich AD; Boyer TJ; Hicks ML; Pelleu GB
J Endod; 1989 May; 15(5):200-3. PubMed ID: 2607290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of three techniques in cleaning the apical portion of curved root canals.
Wu MK; Wesselink PR
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Apr; 79(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 7614212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Comparative evaluation of different instruments for root canal preparation tested on extracted human teeth III. Study of sonic and ultrasonic instruments].
Dobó NC; Bartha K; Bernáth M; Szabó J
Fogorv Sz; 1996 Mar; 89(3):75-84. PubMed ID: 8620978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping of simulated root canals in resin blocks using the step-back technique with K-files manipulated in a simple in/out filling motion.
Alodeh MH; Doller R; Dummer PM
Int Endod J; 1989 May; 22(3):107-17. PubMed ID: 2634618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The validity of using simulated root canals as models for ultrasonic instrumentation.
Ahmad M
J Endod; 1989 Nov; 15(11):544-7. PubMed ID: 2639952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of endosonic instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
Kielt LW; Montgomery S
J Endod; 1987 May; 13(5):215-9. PubMed ID: 3473177
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of four instrumentation techniques on apical canal transportation.
Luiten DJ; Morgan LA; Baugartner JC; Marshall JG
J Endod; 1995 Jan; 21(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 7714431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of sonic versus ultrasonic instrumentation on canal preparation.
Yahya AS; ElDeeb ME
J Endod; 1989 Jun; 15(6):235-9. PubMed ID: 2592876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hand versus ultrasonic instrumentation: its effect on canal shape and instrumentation time.
Pedicord D; elDeeb ME; Messer HH
J Endod; 1986 Sep; 12(9):375-81. PubMed ID: 3463644
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
