These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2599673)
1. Late results of aortic valve replacement with Bjork Shiley prostheses: a comparison of standard aortic valve prosthesis with reversed mitral valve prosthesis implanted in aortic position. Kaul TK; Mercer JL Int J Artif Organs; 1989 Nov; 12(11):728-32. PubMed ID: 2599673 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status of the Beall, Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter cardiac valve prostheses. Brawley RK; Donahoo JS; Gott VL Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jun; 35(6):855-65. PubMed ID: 124127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses. Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982). Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years. Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Selection of valve prosthesis, reoperation and late result--surgical technique of reoperation with Björk-Shiley prosthesis]. Sunamori M; Suzuki A Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1517-20. PubMed ID: 2586456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effect of prosthetic heart valve replacement on the natural course of isolated mitral and aortic as well as multivalvular diseases. Clinical results in 783 patients up to 8 years following implantation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis]. Horstkotte D; Loogen F; Kleikamp G; Schulte HD; Trampisch HJ; Bircks W Z Kardiol; 1983 Sep; 72(9):494-503. PubMed ID: 6636932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Twenty year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Oxenham H; Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Lee RJ; Cunningham J; Prescott RJ; Miller HC Heart; 2003 Jul; 89(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 12807838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses. Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Replacement of cardiac valves with Björk-Shiley and Cooley-Cutter prostheses: a comparative study (author's transl)]. Chiariello L; Wukasch C; Cooley A G Ital Cardiol; 1977; 7(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 856658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]