196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25996928)
21. Number and quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics published in the top general medical and obstetrics and gynecology journals.
Doulaveris G; Vani K; Saccone G; Chauhan SP; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100509. PubMed ID: 34656731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of selective outcome reporting and trial registration practices among addiction clinical trials.
Vassar M; Roberts W; Cooper CM; Wayant C; Bibens M
Addiction; 2020 Jun; 115(6):1172-1179. PubMed ID: 31743532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.
Berwanger O; Ribeiro RA; Finkelsztejn A; Watanabe M; Suzumura EA; Duncan BB; Devereaux PJ; Cook D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Apr; 62(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 19010643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Clinical trial registration in oral health journals.
Smaïl-Faugeron V; Fron-Chabouis H; Durieux P
J Dent Res; 2015 Mar; 94(3 Suppl):8S-13S. PubMed ID: 25274753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Selective outcome reporting in obesity clinical trials: a cross-sectional review.
Rankin J; Ross A; Baker J; O'Brien M; Scheckel C; Vassar M
Clin Obes; 2017 Aug; 7(4):245-254. PubMed ID: 28557240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Is funding source related to study reporting quality in obesity or nutrition randomized control trials in top-tier medical journals?
Kaiser KA; Cofield SS; Fontaine KR; Glasser SP; Thabane L; Chu R; Ambrale S; Dwary AD; Kumar A; Nayyar G; Affuso O; Beasley M; Allison DB
Int J Obes (Lond); 2012 Jul; 36(7):977-81. PubMed ID: 22064159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Peer reviewed evaluation of registered end-points of randomised trials (the PRE-REPORT study): protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised trial.
Jones CW; Adams A; Weaver MA; Schroter S; Misemer BS; Schriger D; Platts-Mills TF
BMJ Open; 2019 Jun; 9(5):e028694. PubMed ID: 31154313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Major discrepancies between what clinical trial registries record and paediatric randomised controlled trials publish.
Rosati P; Porzsolt F; Ricciotti G; Testa G; Inglese R; Giustini F; Fiscarelli E; Zazza M; Carlino C; Balassone V; Fiorito R; D'Amico R
Trials; 2016 Sep; 17(1):430. PubMed ID: 27659549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Discrepancies between Registered and Published Primary and Secondary Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials within the Plastic Surgery Literature: A Systematic Review.
Hudson AS; Morzycki AD; Samargandi OA; Williams JG
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Jan; 145(1):245-255. PubMed ID: 31609284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Standards for reporting randomized controlled trials in neurosurgery.
Kiehna EN; Starke RM; Pouratian N; Dumont AS
J Neurosurg; 2011 Feb; 114(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 21054137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Selective reporting bias due to discrepancies between registered and published outcomes in osteoarthritis trials.
Krsticevic M; Saric D; Saric F; Slapnicar E; Boric K; Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Kegalj MJ; Puljak L
J Comp Eff Res; 2019 Nov; 8(15):1265-1273. PubMed ID: 31739691
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Randomized trials published in higher vs. lower impact journals differ in design, conduct, and analysis.
Bala MM; Akl EA; Sun X; Bassler D; Mertz D; Mejza F; Vandvik PO; Malaga G; Johnston BC; Dahm P; Alonso-Coello P; Diaz-Granados N; Srinathan SK; Hassouneh B; Briel M; Busse JW; You JJ; Walter SD; Altman DG; Guyatt GH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Mar; 66(3):286-95. PubMed ID: 23347852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome reporting discrepancies between trial entries and published final reports of orthodontic randomized controlled trials.
Koufatzidou M; Koletsi D; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):225-230. PubMed ID: 29992332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trial registration and selective outcome reporting in Endodontic Research: Evidence over a 5-year period.
Tzanetakis GN; Koletsi D
Int Endod J; 2021 Oct; 54(10):1794-1803. PubMed ID: 34013569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quality of reporting in randomized trials published in high-quality surgical journals.
Sinha S; Sinha S; Ashby E; Jayaram R; Grocott MP
J Am Coll Surg; 2009 Nov; 209(5):565-571.e1. PubMed ID: 19854395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Feasibility study to examine discrepancy rates in prespecified and reported outcomes in articles submitted to The BMJ.
Weston J; Dwan K; Altman D; Clarke M; Gamble C; Schroter S; Williamson P; Kirkham J
BMJ Open; 2016 Apr; 6(4):e010075. PubMed ID: 27105712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals.
Austin PC; Manca A; Zwarenstein M; Juurlink DN; Stanbrook MB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Feb; 63(2):142-53. PubMed ID: 19716262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The value of lesser-impact-factor surgical journals as a source of negative and inconclusive outcomes reporting.
Kanaan Z; Galandiuk S; Abby M; Shannon KV; Dajani D; Hicks N; Rai SN
Ann Surg; 2011 Mar; 253(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 21270633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
