These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25997194)

  • 21. Dental CAD/CAM technologies: the optical impression (II).
    Pfeiffer J
    Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jan; 2(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11351452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intraoral optical impression systems--an overview.
    Reich S; Vollborn T; Mehl A; Zimmermann M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(2):143-62. PubMed ID: 23930576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accelerated techniques for a post and core and a crown restoration with intraoral digital scanners and CAD/CAM and rapid prototyping.
    Lee JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1024-9. PubMed ID: 24951388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The new acquisition unit Cerec AC.
    Schenk O
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 19213359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A Contemporary Approach to Intraoral Optical Scanning and In-Office 3-D Printing.
    Scherer MD
    Dent Today; 2015 Dec; 34(12):46-7. PubMed ID: 26749873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Use of selective open architecture in digital restoration fabrication.
    Schroder BK; Brown C
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2010; 31 Spec No 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 21049825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of implant-supported interim restorations to transfer periimplant soft tissue profiles to a milled polyurethane definitive cast.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 23684284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Technical report: precisely fitting bars on implants in five steps-a CAD/CAM concept for the edentulous mandible.
    Beuer F; Schweiger J; Huber M; Engels J; Stimmelmayr M
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):333-6. PubMed ID: 24417790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [CAD/CAM technology-elaboration of electronic model through optical impression in the fabrication of the dental prostheses by a computer assisted device].
    Neumann CP; Tatarciuc MS; Viţalariu A; Diaconu D; Luca O
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2000; 104(2):161-3. PubMed ID: 12089985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
    Ender A; Mehl A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty?
    Garg AK
    Dent Implantol Update; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18399300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Today's CAD/CAM: flexible digital technologies expanding workflow options.
    Ferencz JL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):222-3. PubMed ID: 25822749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Digitization of simulated clinical dental impressions: virtual three-dimensional analysis of exactness.
    Persson AS; Odén A; Andersson M; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jul; 25(7):929-36. PubMed ID: 19264353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Care and maintenance of the Cerec camera.
    Böhrs R
    Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 11351460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data.
    Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions.
    Henkel GL
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Aug; 28(8):422-4, 426-8, 430-1. PubMed ID: 18578100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Fabrication of a resin appliance with alloy components using digital technology without an analog impression.
    Al Mortadi N; Jones Q; Eggbeer D; Lewis J; Williams RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Nov; 148(5):862-7. PubMed ID: 26522047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Take 1® Advanced™ final impression material: precise delivery, better control.
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Feb; 36(2):156. PubMed ID: 25997193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct mechanical data acquisition of dental impressions for the manufacturing of CAD/CAM restorations.
    Quaas S; Rudolph H; Luthardt RG
    J Dent; 2007 Dec; 35(12):903-8. PubMed ID: 17980951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.