These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25997194)

  • 41. PlanScan™ CAD/CAM solution: producing crowns chairside "easier, better".
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2015 Mar; 36(3):224. PubMed ID: 25997197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The optical Cerec impression--electronic model production.
    Wiedhahn K
    Int J Comput Dent; 1998 Sep; 1(1):41-54. PubMed ID: 11351459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Digital Technologies: A Roundtable Discussion on Changing the Face of Dentistry.
    Kugel G; Ganz SD; Agarwal T
    Dent Today; 2017 Jun; 36(6):18,20, 22, 24. PubMed ID: 29231032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. All I Want for Christmas...
    Feuerstein P
    Dent Today; 2015 Dec; 34(12):20. PubMed ID: 26750783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Taking the mystery out of CAD/CAM in dental practice.
    Duke ES
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2004 Feb; 25(2):140-3. PubMed ID: 15645873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The use of a scannable impression coping and digital impression technique to fabricate a customized anatomic abutment and zirconia restoration in the esthetic zone.
    Lin WS; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 23522368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Conventional versus virtual--it's the perspective that counts.
    Reich S
    Int J Comput Dent; 2014; 17(4):271-2. PubMed ID: 25643459
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Use of intraoral digital scanning for a CAD/CAM-fabricated milled bar and superstructure framework for an implant-supported, removable complete dental prosthesis.
    Lin WS; Chou JC; Metz MJ; Harris BT; Morton D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):509-15. PubMed ID: 25862270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fabricating complete dentures with CAD/CAM technology.
    Infante L; Yilmaz B; McGlumphy E; Finger I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 24461946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Integrating images in dental manufacturing technology: the prosthetic value chain.
    Scarfe WC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Sep; 112(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 21827958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A clinical protocol for intraoral digital impression of screw-retained CAD/CAM framework on multiple implants based on wavefront sampling technology.
    Moreno A; Giménez B; Özcan M; Pradíes G
    Implant Dent; 2013 Aug; 22(4):320-5. PubMed ID: 23817542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Improving the efficiency of intraoral scanning.
    Liu W; Huang GJ
    J Clin Orthod; 2014 Sep; 48(9):549-54. PubMed ID: 25329628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Impression-free/model-free anterior fixed partial denture: a novel CAD/CAM approach.
    Helvey G
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 19583169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Stand-alone scanning systems simplify intraoral digital impressioning.
    Stein JM
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011; 32 Spec No 4():56, 58-9. PubMed ID: 22195353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Individual impression spoons. New manufacturing procedures for individual impression spoons].
    Wirz J; Schmidli F
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1987; 97(11):1417-22. PubMed ID: 3321432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The evolving e-practice. In-office digital dentistry: cutting-edge technologies for impression capture, restorative design, and prosthesis fabrication.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2009; 21(2):90-2. PubMed ID: 19583166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital model planning and computerized fabrication of orthognathic surgery wafers.
    Cousley RR; Turner MJ
    J Orthod; 2014 Mar; 41(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 24235100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Digital implant impression taking - an overview].
    Mahl D; Glenz F; Marinello CP
    Swiss Dent J; 2014; 124(2):165-86. PubMed ID: 24585419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Parameters of passive fit using a new technique to mill implant-supported superstructures: an in vitro study of a novel three-dimensional force measurement-misfit method.
    Tahmaseb A; van de Weijden JJ; Mercelis P; De Clerck R; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):247-57. PubMed ID: 20369082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A simplified approach to implant restorations using innovative digital technology.
    Brooks JH; Wicks RA; Hottel TL
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2014; 94(2):41-4; quiz 45-6. PubMed ID: 25842466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.