128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25997935)
1. Fundamental Frequency Range in Japanese and English: The Case of Simultaneous Bilinguals.
Graham C
Phonetica; 2014; 71(4):271-95. PubMed ID: 25997935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fundamental frequency in monolingual English, bilingual English/Russian, and bilingual English/Cantonese young adult women.
Altenberg EP; Ferrand CT
J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 15990273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perception of acoustic cues to Tokyo Japanese pitch-accent contrasts in native Japanese and naive English listeners.
Shport IA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):307-18. PubMed ID: 26233031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German.
Mennen I; Schaeffler F; Docherty G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22423720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intonational and Syntactic Innovations in a Language Contact Situation: An Explorative Study of Yes/No Questions in Paraguayan Guarani-Spanish Bilinguals.
Pešková A
Lang Speech; 2024 Jun; 67(2):561-589. PubMed ID: 35377249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Proficiency in English sentence stress production by Cantonese speakers who speak English as a second language (ESL).
Ng ML; Chen Y
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):526-35. PubMed ID: 21793782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying residual speech sound disorders in bilingual children: a Japanese-english case study.
Preston JL; Seki A
Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 May; 20(2):73-85. PubMed ID: 21386046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Tale of Two Features: Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tone and English Lexical Stress in Cantonese-English Bilinguals.
Tong X; Lee SM; Lee MM; Burnham D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142896. PubMed ID: 26606073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of L1 prosody on segmental contrast in L2: The case of English stop voicing contrast produced by Korean speakers.
Choi J; Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):EL76-82. PubMed ID: 27036291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intonational differences between L1 and L2 english in South Africa.
Swerts M; Zerbian S
Phonetica; 2010; 67(3):127-46. PubMed ID: 20926913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants.
Fernald A; Taeschner T; Dunn J; Papousek M; de Boysson-Bardies B; Fukui I
J Child Lang; 1989 Oct; 16(3):477-501. PubMed ID: 2808569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voice pitch characteristics of Cantonese and English produced by Cantonese-English bilingual children.
Ng ML; Hsueh G; Sam Leung CS
Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2010 Jun; 12(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 20433341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intelligibility of American English vowels and consonants spoken by international students in the United States.
Jin SH; Liu C
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Apr; 57(2):583-96. PubMed ID: 24686793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Sources of Accent in Second Language Japanese Speech.
Idemaru K; Wei P; Gubbins L
Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 29764295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cross-Linguistic Differences in Bilinguals' Fundamental Frequency Ranges.
Ordin M; Mennen I
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jun; 60(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 28586823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does Second Language Experience Modulate Perception of Tones in a Third Language?
Qin Z; Jongman A
Lang Speech; 2016 Sep; 59(Pt 3):318-38. PubMed ID: 29924528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speaking a foreign language and its effect on F0.
Järvinen K; Laukkanen AM; Aaltonen O
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Jul; 38(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 22612530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The interdependence of tonal and durational cues in the perception of rhythmic groups.
Cumming RE
Phonetica; 2010; 67(4):219-42. PubMed ID: 21525778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
Yan N; Lam PK; Ng ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 23051971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
