271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25998130)
1. In vitro biomechanical testing of different configurations of acrylic external skeletal fixator constructs.
Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Singh J; Madhu DN
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2015; 28(4):227-33. PubMed ID: 25998130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of in vitro mechanical properties of different designs of epoxy-pin external skeletal fixation systems.
Tyagi SK; Aithal HP; Kinjavdekar P; Amarpal ; Pawde AM; Srivastava T; Tyagi KP; Monsang SW
Vet Surg; 2014 Mar; 43(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 24410773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical evaluation of various external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations using a tubular plastic bone model.
Van Wettere AJ; Wallace LJ; Redig PT; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE
J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):263-76. PubMed ID: 20235457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mechanical evaluation of external skeletal fixator-intramedullary pin tie-in configurations applied to cadaveral humeri from red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis).
Van Wettere AJ; Redig PT; Wallace LJ; Bourgeault CA; Bechtold JE
J Avian Med Surg; 2009 Dec; 23(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20235458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Orthogonal pin construct versus parallel uniplanar pin constructs for pelvic external fixation: a biomechanical assessment of stiffness and strength.
Archdeacon MT; Arebi S; Le TT; Wirth R; Kebel R; Thakore M
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Feb; 23(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 19169101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mechanics of Supplemental Drop Wire and Half-Pin Fixation Elements in Single Ring Circular External Fixator Constructs.
Lewis RA; Lewis DD; Anderson CL; Hudson CC; Coggeshall JD; Iorgulescu AD; Banks SA
Vet Surg; 2016 May; 45(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 27009685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An in vitro biomechanical study of a multiplanar circular external fixator applied to equine third metacarpal bones.
Cervantes C; Madison JB; Miller GJ; Casar RS
Vet Surg; 1996; 25(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8719080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relative stiffness and stress of type I and type II external fixators: acrylic versus stainless-steel connecting bars--a theoretical approach.
Shahar R
Vet Surg; 2000; 29(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 10653496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of various distal ring-block configurations on the biomechanical properties of circular external skeletal fixators for use in dogs and cats.
Cross AR; Lewis DD; Rigaud S; Rapoff AJ
Am J Vet Res; 2004 Apr; 65(4):393-8. PubMed ID: 15077678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical and Cost Comparisons of Near-Far and Pin-Bar Constructs.
Whitney Kluk A; Zhang T; Russell JP; Kim H; Hsieh AH; O'Toole RV
Orthopedics; 2017 Mar; 40(2):e238-e241. PubMed ID: 27735977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of an interdental full pin on stability of an acrylic external fixator for rostral mandibular fractures in dogs.
Cook WT; Smith MM; Markel MD; Grant JW
Am J Vet Res; 2001 Apr; 62(4):576-80. PubMed ID: 11327467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical performance of hybrid Ilizarov external fixator in comparison with Ilizarov circular external fixator.
Yilmaz E; Belhan O; Karakurt L; Arslan N; Serin E
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2003 Jul; 18(6):518-22. PubMed ID: 12828901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical properties of the Pinless external fixator on human tibiae.
Remiger AR
Injury; 1992; 23 Suppl 3():S28-43. PubMed ID: 1286919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fixation stiffness of Dynafix unilateral external fixator in neutral and non-neutral configurations.
Koo TK; Chao EY; Mak AF
Biomed Mater Eng; 2005; 15(6):433-44. PubMed ID: 16308459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mechanical evaluation of the effect of the rod to rod distance on the stiffness of uniplanar external fixator frames.
Pourabbas B; Emad J; Dehghani J; Heidari S; Vosoughi AR
Musculoskelet Surg; 2023 Dec; 107(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 37029888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro biomechanical testing of a micro external skeletal fixator.
Deiss R; Bali MS; Doherr M; Spreng D; Rytz U; Ferguson SJ
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol; 2013; 26(5):385-91. PubMed ID: 23708943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of strategies to increase external fixator stiffness: is double stacking worth the cost?
Strebe S; Kim H; Russell JP; Hsieh AH; Nascone J; O'Toole RV
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1049-53. PubMed ID: 24342369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical study of a low-cost external fixator for diaphyseal fractures of long bones.
Kouassi KJ; Cartiaux O; Fonkoué L; Detrembleur C; Cornu O
J Orthop Surg Res; 2020 Jul; 15(1):247. PubMed ID: 32631381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of torsional properties between a Fixateur Externe du Service de Santé des Armées and an acrylic tie-in external skeletal fixator in a red-tailed hawk (
Hersh-Boyle RA; Kapatkin AS; Garcia TC; Robinson DA; Sanchez-Migallon Guzman D; Kerrigan SM; Chou PY; Stover SM
Am J Vet Res; 2020 Jul; 81(7):557-564. PubMed ID: 32584184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External fixation design evolution enhances biomechanical frame performance.
Sellei RM; Kobbe P; Dadgar A; Pfeifer R; Behrens M; von Oldenburg G; Pape HC
Injury; 2015 Sep; 46 Suppl 3():S23-6. PubMed ID: 26458295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
