These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25998741)

  • 1. Further evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence with and without programmed reinforcement.
    Wilder DA; Majdalany L; Sturkie L; Smeltz L
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):511-22. PubMed ID: 25998741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of high-p and low-p instruction similarity on compliance among young children.
    Lipschultz JL; Wilder DA; Ertel H; Enderli A
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2018 Oct; 51(4):866-878. PubMed ID: 29911333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of positive and negative reinforcement for compliance to treat problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Slocum SK; Vollmer TR
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015 Sep; 48(3):563-74. PubMed ID: 25969379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A method to establish stimulus control and compliance with instructions.
    Borgen JG; Charles Mace F; Cavanaugh BM; Shamlian K; Lit KR; Wilson JB; Trauschke SL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Oct; 50(4):830-842. PubMed ID: 28940482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of the high-probability instruction sequence with and without programmed reinforcement for compliance with high-probability instructions.
    Zuluaga CA; Normand MP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2008; 41(3):453-7. PubMed ID: 18816986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of Various High-Probability to Low-Probability Instruction Ratios During the Use of the High-Probability Instructional Sequence.
    Ertel H; Wilder DA; Hodges A; Hurtado L
    Behav Modif; 2019 Sep; 43(5):639-655. PubMed ID: 29902925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of reinforcer quality on behavioral momentum: coordinated applied and basic research.
    Mace FC; Mauro BC; Boyajian AE; Eckert TL
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 9157095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What good is labeling what's good? A field experimental investigation of parental labeled praise and child compliance.
    Leijten P; Thomaes S; Orobio de Castro B; Dishion TJ; Matthys W
    Behav Res Ther; 2016 Dec; 87():134-141. PubMed ID: 27665415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the high-probability instructional sequence to increase compliance with multiple low-probability instructions among children with autism.
    Rosales MK; Wilder DA; Montalvo M; Fagan B
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2021 Apr; 54(2):760-769. PubMed ID: 33029788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of variable-time versus contingent reinforcement delivery on problem behavior maintained by escape.
    Lomas Mevers JE; Fisher WW; Kelley ME; Fredrick LD
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2014; 47(2):277-92. PubMed ID: 24764205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using the high-probability instructional sequence to improve initiation and completion of low-probability instructions in young autistic children.
    Russo DA; Blair KC
    Res Dev Disabil; 2023 Mar; 134():104422. PubMed ID: 36610208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing Consequence Variables Within the High-Probability Instructional Sequence for a Child Diagnosed With CHARGE Syndrome.
    Davis CR; Axe JB
    Behav Anal Pract; 2021 Jun; 14(2):352-359. PubMed ID: 34150451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent research on the high-probability instructional sequence: A brief review.
    Lipschultz J; Wilder DA
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2017 Apr; 50(2):424-428. PubMed ID: 28177117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Differential reinforcement of other behavior and noncontingent reinforcement as control procedures during the modification of a preschooler's compliance.
    Goetz EM; Holmberg MC; LeBlanc JM
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1975; 8(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 1141083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competition between positive and negative reinforcement in the treatment of escape behavior.
    Lalli JS; Vollmer TR; Progar PR; Wright C; Borrero J; Daniel D; Barthold CH; Tocco K; May W
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1999; 32(3):285-96. PubMed ID: 10513025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Noncontingent Reinforcement to Improve Classroom Behavior of a Student With Developmental Disability.
    Moore TC; Robinson CC; Coleman MB; Cihak DF; Park Y
    Behav Modif; 2016 Jul; 40(4):640-57. PubMed ID: 26872956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Praising child compliance: reinforcement or ritual?
    Roberts MW
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1985 Dec; 13(4):611-29. PubMed ID: 4078190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of a high-probability instruction sequence and response-independent reinforcer delivery on child compliance.
    Bullock C; Normand MP
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2006; 39(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 17236350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clarifying inconclusive functional analysis results: Assessment and treatment of automatically reinforced aggression.
    Saini V; Greer BD; Fisher WW
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2015; 48(2):315-30. PubMed ID: 25891269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Positive antecedent and consequent components in child compliance training.
    Speights Roberts D; Tingstrom DH; Olmi DJ; Bellipanni KD
    Behav Modif; 2008 Jan; 32(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 18096970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.