169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25999143)
1. A High-Resolution Comparative Chromosome Map of Cricetus cricetus and Peromyscus eremicus Reveals the Involvement of Constitutive Heterochromatin in Breakpoint Regions.
Vieira-da-Silva A; Louzada S; Adega F; Chaves R
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2015; 145(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 25999143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Different evolutionary trails in the related genomes Cricetus cricetus and Peromyscus eremicus (Rodentia, Cricetidae) uncovered by orthologous satellite DNA repositioning.
Louzada S; Paço A; Kubickova S; Adega F; Guedes-Pinto H; Rubes J; Chaves R
Micron; 2008 Dec; 39(8):1149-55. PubMed ID: 18602266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.
Chaves R; Louzada S; Meles S; Wienberg J; Adega F
Chromosome Res; 2012 Aug; 20(6):673-83. PubMed ID: 22847644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Peromyscus maniculatus--Mus musculus chromosome homology map derived from reciprocal cross species chromosome painting.
Mlynarski EE; Obergfell CJ; Rens W; O'Brien PC; Ramsdell CM; Dewey MJ; O'Neill MJ; O'Neill RJ
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2008; 121(3-4):288-92. PubMed ID: 18758174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.
Romanenko SA; Volobouev VT; Perelman PL; Lebedev VS; Serdukova NA; Trifonov VA; Biltueva LS; Nie W; O'Brien PC; Bulatova NSh; Ferguson-Smith MA; Yang F; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2007; 15(3):283-97. PubMed ID: 17333534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.
Mlynarski EE; Obergfell CJ; O'Neill MJ; O'Neill RJ
Mamm Genome; 2010 Feb; 21(1-2):77-87. PubMed ID: 20033182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hidden heterochromatin: Characterization in the Rodentia species Cricetus cricetus, Peromyscus eremicus (Cricetidae) and Praomys tullbergi (Muridae).
Paço A; Adega F; Guedes-Pinto H; Chaves R
Genet Mol Biol; 2009 Jan; 32(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 21637647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Karyotypic evolution of hapalomys inferred from chromosome painting: a detailed characterization contributing new insights into the ancestral murinae karyotype.
Badenhorst D; Dobigny G; Robinson TJ
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2012; 136(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 22222239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Allocricetulus argyropulo 1932 (Cricetidae, Rodentia).
Romanenko SA; Lebedev VS; Serdukova NA; Feoktistova NY; Surov AV; Graphodatsky AS
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2013; 139(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 23328385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel satellite DNA sequence in the Peromyscus genome (PMSat): Evolution via copy number fluctuation.
Louzada S; Vieira-da-Silva A; Mendes-da-Silva A; Kubickova S; Rubes J; Adega F; Chaves R
Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Nov; 92():193-203. PubMed ID: 26103000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative genome mapping of the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) reveals greater similarity to rat (Rattus norvegicus) than to the lab mouse (Mus musculus).
Ramsdell CM; Lewandowski AA; Glenn JL; Vrana PB; O'Neill RJ; Dewey MJ
BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Feb; 8():65. PubMed ID: 18302785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Karyotype Evolution in 10 Pinniped Species: Variability of Heterochromatin versus High Conservatism of Euchromatin as Revealed by Comparative Molecular Cytogenetics.
Beklemisheva VR; Perelman PL; Lemskaya NA; Proskuryakova AA; Serdyukova NA; Burkanov VN; Gorshunov MB; Ryder O; Thompson M; Lento G; O'Brien SJ; Graphodatsky AS
Genes (Basel); 2020 Dec; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 33321928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosomes of Peromyscus (rodentia, cricetidae). VI. The genomic size.
Deaven LL; Vidal-Rioja L; Jett JH; Hsu TC
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1977; 19(5):241-9. PubMed ID: 606503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative mapping of mouse and rat chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization.
Grützner F; Himmelbauer H; Paulsen M; Ropers HH; Haaf T
Genomics; 1999 Feb; 55(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 10049585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromosome evolution of MMU16 and RNO11: conserved synteny associated with gene order rearrangements explicable by intrachromosomal recombinations and neocentromere emergence.
Szpirer C; Rivière M; VanVooren P; Moisan MP; Haller O; Szpirer J
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2005; 108(4):322-7. PubMed ID: 15627752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Further insights into the ancestral murine karyotype: the contribution of the Otomys-Mus comparison using chromosome painting.
Engelbrecht A; Dobigny G; Robinson TJ
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006; 112(1-2):126-30. PubMed ID: 16276101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. LINE-1 retrotransposons: from 'parasite' sequences to functional elements.
Paço A; Adega F; Chaves R
J Appl Genet; 2015 Feb; 56(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 25106509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mapping genomic rearrangements in titi monkeys by chromosome flow sorting and multidirectional in-situ hybridization.
Dumas F; Bigoni F; Stone G; Sineo L; Stanyon R
Chromosome Res; 2005; 13(1):85-96. PubMed ID: 15791414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cross-species chromosome painting in Cetartiodactyla: reconstructing the karyotype evolution in key phylogenetic lineages.
Kulemzina AI; Trifonov VA; Perelman PL; Rubtsova NV; Volobuev V; Ferguson-Smith MA; Stanyon R; Yang F; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2009; 17(3):419-36. PubMed ID: 19350402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.
Romanenko SA; Perelman PL; Serdukova NA; Trifonov VA; Biltueva LS; Wang J; Li T; Nie W; O'Brien PC; Volobouev VT; Stanyon R; Ferguson-Smith MA; Yang F; Graphodatsky AS
Mamm Genome; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1183-92. PubMed ID: 17143584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
