These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 25999834)

  • 1. Real-time vision, tactile cues, and visual form agnosia: removing haptic feedback from a "natural" grasping task induces pantomime-like grasps.
    Whitwell RL; Ganel T; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():216. PubMed ID: 25999834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DF's visual brain in action: the role of tactile cues.
    Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Cavina-Pratesi C; Byrne CM; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Mar; 55():41-50. PubMed ID: 24300664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Patient DF's visual brain in action: Visual feedforward control in visual form agnosia.
    Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Cavina-Pratesi C; Barat M; Goodale MA
    Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt B):265-76. PubMed ID: 25199609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Role of Haptic Expectations in Reaching to Grasp: From Pantomime to Natural Grasps and Back Again.
    Whitwell RL; Katz NJ; Goodale MA; Enns JT
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():588428. PubMed ID: 33391110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pantomime-grasping: the 'return' of haptic feedback supports the absolute specification of object size.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Yau M; Westwood DA; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2029-40. PubMed ID: 25869741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Two Visual Systems Hypothesis: New Challenges and Insights from Visual form Agnosic Patient DF.
    Whitwell RL; Milner AD; Goodale MA
    Front Neurol; 2014; 5():255. PubMed ID: 25538675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Haptic feedback attenuates illusory bias in pantomime-grasping: evidence for a visuo-haptic calibration.
    Chan J; Heath M
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Apr; 235(4):1041-1051. PubMed ID: 28070622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of visual feedback from the recent past on the programming of grip aperture is grasp-specific, shared between hands, and mediated by sensorimotor memory not task set.
    Tang R; Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Cognition; 2015 May; 138():49-63. PubMed ID: 25704582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The spatial relations between stimulus and response determine an absolute visuo-haptic calibration in pantomime-grasping.
    Davarpanah Jazi S; Heath M
    Brain Cogn; 2017 Jun; 114():29-39. PubMed ID: 28346879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct visual resolution supports aperture shaping in natural and pantomime-grasping.
    Heath M; Ayala N; Hamidi M; Tari B
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2022 Mar; 76(1):22-28. PubMed ID: 34694839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coming to grips with reality: Real grasps, but not pantomimed grasps, resist a simultaneous tilt illusion.
    Whitwell RL; Hasan HA; MacNeil RR; Enns JT
    Neuropsychologia; 2023 Dec; 191():108726. PubMed ID: 37931746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences in the visual control of pantomimed and natural grasping movements.
    Goodale MA; Jakobson LS; Keillor JM
    Neuropsychologia; 1994 Oct; 32(10):1159-78. PubMed ID: 7845558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender differences in non-standard mapping tasks: A kinematic study using pantomimed reach-to-grasp actions.
    Copley-Mills J; Connolly JD; Cavina-Pratesi C
    Cortex; 2016 Sep; 82():244-254. PubMed ID: 27410715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders.
    Cuijpers RH; Brenner E; Smeets JB
    Hum Mov Sci; 2008 Dec; 27(6):857-72. PubMed ID: 18834640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Nothing magical: pantomimed grasping is controlled by the ventral system.
    Rinsma T; van der Kamp J; Dicks M; Cañal-Bruland R
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Jun; 235(6):1823-1833. PubMed ID: 28299409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How vision affects kinematic properties of pantomimed prehension movements.
    Fukui T; Inui T
    Front Psychol; 2013; 4():44. PubMed ID: 23404470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grasping without vision: time normalizing grip aperture profiles yields spurious grip scaling to target size.
    Whitwell RL; Goodale MA
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1878-87. PubMed ID: 23796704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of visual and haptic feedback on grasping movements.
    Bozzacchi C; Volcic R; Domini F
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Dec; 112(12):3189-96. PubMed ID: 25231616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tactile-Based Pantomime Grasping: Knowledge of Results is Not Enough to Support an Absolute Calibration.
    Heath M; Chan J; Davarpanah Jazi S
    J Mot Behav; 2019; 51(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 29236589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.