526 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26001199)
21. Acoustofluidics and whole-blood manipulation in surface acoustic wave counterflow devices.
Travagliati M; Shilton RJ; Pagliazzi M; Tonazzini I; Beltram F; Cecchini M
Anal Chem; 2014 Nov; 86(21):10633-8. PubMed ID: 25260018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Direct 2D measurement of time-averaged forces and pressure amplitudes in acoustophoretic devices using optical trapping.
Lakämper S; Lamprecht A; Schaap IA; Dual J
Lab Chip; 2015 Jan; 15(1):290-300. PubMed ID: 25370872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional continuous particle focusing in a microfluidic channel via standing surface acoustic waves (SSAW).
Shi J; Yazdi S; Lin SC; Ding X; Chiang IK; Sharp K; Huang TJ
Lab Chip; 2011 Jul; 11(14):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21709881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The importance of travelling wave components in standing surface acoustic wave (SSAW) systems.
Devendran C; Albrecht T; Brenker J; Alan T; Neild A
Lab Chip; 2016 Sep; 16(19):3756-3766. PubMed ID: 27722363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Surface Acoustic Wave-Based Microfluidic Device for Microparticles Manipulation: Effects of Microchannel Elasticity on the Device Performance.
Mezzanzanica G; Français O; Mariani S
Micromachines (Basel); 2023 Sep; 14(9):. PubMed ID: 37763962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. 3D numerical simulation of acoustophoretic motion induced by boundary-driven acoustic streaming in standing surface acoustic wave microfluidics.
Namnabat MS; Moghimi Zand M; Houshfar E
Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13326. PubMed ID: 34172758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A discussion about the velocity distribution commonly used as the boundary condition in surface acoustic wave numerical simulations.
Jazini Dorcheh F; Ghassemi M
Biomed Microdevices; 2023 Oct; 25(4):42. PubMed ID: 37874402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. On the acoustically induced fluid flow in particle separation systems employing standing surface acoustic waves - Part II.
Sachs S; Cierpka C; König J
Lab Chip; 2022 May; 22(10):2028-2040. PubMed ID: 35485185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Neutrophil-inspired propulsion in a combined acoustic and magnetic field.
Ahmed D; Baasch T; Blondel N; Läubli N; Dual J; Nelson BJ
Nat Commun; 2017 Oct; 8(1):770. PubMed ID: 28974671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modelling of SAW-PDMS acoustofluidics: physical fields and particle motions influenced by different descriptions of the PDMS domain.
Ni Z; Yin C; Xu G; Xie L; Huang J; Liu S; Tu J; Guo X; Zhang D
Lab Chip; 2019 Aug; 19(16):2728-2740. PubMed ID: 31292597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fabrication, operation and flow visualization in surface-acoustic-wave-driven acoustic-counterflow microfluidics.
Travagliati M; Shilton R; Beltram F; Cecchini M
J Vis Exp; 2013 Aug; (78):. PubMed ID: 24022515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Theoretical study of time-dependent, ultrasound-induced acoustic streaming in microchannels.
Muller PB; Bruus H
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Dec; 92(6):063018. PubMed ID: 26764815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Surface acoustic wave induced particle manipulation in a PDMS channel--principle concepts for continuous flow applications.
Johansson L; Enlund J; Johansson S; Katardjiev I; Yantchev V
Biomed Microdevices; 2012 Apr; 14(2):279-89. PubMed ID: 22076383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Acoustophoretic Control of Microparticle Transport Using Dual-Wavelength Surface Acoustic Wave Devices.
Hsu JC; Hsu CH; Huang YW
Micromachines (Basel); 2019 Jan; 10(1):. PubMed ID: 30642118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Focusing of sub-micrometer particles and bacteria enabled by two-dimensional acoustophoresis.
Antfolk M; Muller PB; Augustsson P; Bruus H; Laurell T
Lab Chip; 2014 Aug; 14(15):2791-9. PubMed ID: 24895052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Controlled rotation and translation of spherical particles or living cells by surface acoustic waves.
Bernard I; Doinikov AA; Marmottant P; Rabaud D; Poulain C; Thibault P
Lab Chip; 2017 Jul; 17(14):2470-2480. PubMed ID: 28617509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Numerical study of the effect of channel aspect ratio on particle focusing in acoustophoretic devices.
Spigarelli L; Vasile NS; Pirri CF; Canavese G
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19447. PubMed ID: 33173108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Separation of Escherichia coli bacteria from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using standing surface acoustic waves.
Ai Y; Sanders CK; Marrone BL
Anal Chem; 2013 Oct; 85(19):9126-34. PubMed ID: 23968497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Acoustophoresis around an elastic scatterer in a standing wave field.
Kshetri KG; Nama N
Phys Rev E; 2023 Oct; 108(4-2):045102. PubMed ID: 37978594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fabrication of Surface Acoustic Wave Devices on Lithium Niobate.
Mei J; Zhang N; Friend J
J Vis Exp; 2020 Jun; (160):. PubMed ID: 32628169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
