These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26001220)
21. Equity for open-access journal publishing. Shieber SM PLoS Biol; 2009 Aug; 7(8):e1000165. PubMed ID: 19652697 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Peer review of NZMJ articles: issues raised after publication of the viewpoint article on Janet Frame. Frizelle FA N Z Med J; 2007 Oct; 120(1264):U2788; discussion U2787. PubMed ID: 17972995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Open access to peer-reviewed research: making it happen. Tamber PS; Godlee F; Newmark P Lancet; 2003 Nov; 362(9395):1575-7. PubMed ID: 14615116 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Editorial. Andersen OS J Gen Physiol; 2005 Jan; 125(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 15623893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Moving towards open access: high-quality research and publication is essential, but visibility of the work is critical. Vahlquist A; Egelrud T; Andersson A Acta Derm Venereol; 2010; 90(1):3. PubMed ID: 20107714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Reviewer assistance: focus on comments to authors and manuscript decisions. Berquist TH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):697-8. PubMed ID: 25247932 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reviewer assistance: how important is the invitation letter? Berquist TH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Sep; 203(3):467. PubMed ID: 25148147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. European Urology: an American perspective. Freedland SJ Eur Urol; 2012 Jun; 61(6):1197-8. PubMed ID: 22475773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. On editorial practice and peer review. Shahar E J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Aug; 13(4):699-701. PubMed ID: 17683318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. JOURNAL CLUB: Plagiarism in Manuscripts Submitted to the AJR: Development of an Optimal Screening Algorithm and Management Pathways. Taylor DB AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Apr; 208(4):712-720. PubMed ID: 28125269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The journal's performance and upcoming new features. Hupp JR J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 71(9):1481-3. PubMed ID: 23948361 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted? Pravinkumar E Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Rigour and respect: aspects for consideration when undertaking and publishing research. Marchant S Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):264-7. PubMed ID: 20466468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Communicating research to the peers. Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jul; 60(7):645-7. PubMed ID: 17573975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reducing the costs of peer review. Nat Neurosci; 2008 Apr; 11(4):375. PubMed ID: 18368038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. 10+10: rapid decisions and fast track publication for RCTs. The Lancet Lancet; 2015 Feb; 385(9968):578. PubMed ID: 25706070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]