These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26001381)

  • 1. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
    Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
    Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
    Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
    Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective auditory cues can improve detection of near-threshold visual targets.
    Rimsky-Robert D; Störmer V; Sackur J; Sergent C
    Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18966. PubMed ID: 31831788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.
    Xu Z; Yang W; Zhou Z; Ren Y
    Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 31953644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.
    Paavilainen P; Illi J; Moisseinen N; Niinisalo M; Ojala K; Reinikainen J; Vainio L
    Scand J Psychol; 2016 Jun; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26926651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the spatial specificity of audiovisual crossmodal exogenous cuing effects.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():78-88. PubMed ID: 28477457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
    Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.
    Yang Z; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Mar; 35(3):964-74. PubMed ID: 23288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
    Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
    Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
    Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down, bottom-up, and history-driven processing of multisensory attentional cues in intellectual disability: An experimental study in virtual reality.
    Kim J; Hwang E; Shin H; Gil YH; Lee J
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261298. PubMed ID: 34932566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.