497 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26001381)
1. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Exogenous spatial attention decreases audiovisual integration.
Van der Stoep N; Van der Stigchel S; Nijboer TC
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Feb; 77(2):464-82. PubMed ID: 25341648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attentional reorienting triggers spatial asymmetries in a search task with cross-modal spatial cueing.
Paladini RE; Diana L; Zito GA; Nyffeler T; Wyss P; Mosimann UP; Müri RM; Nef T; Cazzoli D
PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190677. PubMed ID: 29293637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues.
Barrett DJ; Krumbholz K
Exp Brain Res; 2012 Oct; 222(1-2):11-20. PubMed ID: 22975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective auditory cues can improve detection of near-threshold visual targets.
Rimsky-Robert D; Störmer V; Sackur J; Sergent C
Sci Rep; 2019 Dec; 9(1):18966. PubMed ID: 31831788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cue-target onset asynchrony modulates interaction between exogenous attention and audiovisual integration.
Xu Z; Yang W; Zhou Z; Ren Y
Cogn Process; 2020 May; 21(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 31953644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.
Paavilainen P; Illi J; Moisseinen N; Niinisalo M; Ojala K; Reinikainen J; Vainio L
Scand J Psychol; 2016 Jun; 57(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 26926651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. On the spatial specificity of audiovisual crossmodal exogenous cuing effects.
Lee J; Spence C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jun; 177():78-88. PubMed ID: 28477457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the relative contributions of multisensory integration and crossmodal exogenous spatial attention to multisensory response enhancement.
Van der Stoep N; Spence C; Nijboer TC; Van der Stigchel S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():20-8. PubMed ID: 26436587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The cued recognition task: dissociating the abrupt onset effect from the social and arrow cueing effect.
Xu B; Tanaka JW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):97-110. PubMed ID: 25190323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.
Yang Z; Mayer AR
Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Mar; 35(3):964-74. PubMed ID: 23288620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adults with dyslexia can use cues to orient and constrain attention but have a smaller and weaker attention spotlight.
Moores E; Tsouknida E; Romani C
Vision Res; 2015 Jun; 111(Pt A):55-65. PubMed ID: 25872179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic selective attention as a function of sensory modality in aging.
Guerreiro MJ; Adam JJ; Van Gerven PW
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2012 Mar; 67(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 21798856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Top-down, bottom-up, and history-driven processing of multisensory attentional cues in intellectual disability: An experimental study in virtual reality.
Kim J; Hwang E; Shin H; Gil YH; Lee J
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261298. PubMed ID: 34932566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
