These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

289 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26001949)

  • 21. Women's birth place preferences in the United Kingdom: a systematic review and narrative synthesis of the quantitative literature.
    Hollowell J; Li Y; Malouf R; Buchanan J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):213. PubMed ID: 27503004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of partnership caseload midwifery care with conventional team midwifery care: labour and birth outcomes.
    Benjamin Y; Walsh D; Taub N
    Midwifery; 2001 Sep; 17(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 11502143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Women׳s motivations for having unassisted childbirth or high-risk homebirth: An exploration of the literature on 'birthing outside the system'.
    Holten L; de Miranda E
    Midwifery; 2016 Jul; 38():55-62. PubMed ID: 27055760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Choice in maternity: rhetoric, reality and resistance.
    Mander R; Melender HL
    Midwifery; 2009 Dec; 25(6):637-48. PubMed ID: 18222574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Women's reasons and perceptions around planning a homebirth with a registered midwife in Western Australia.
    Hauck Y; Nathan E; Ball C; Hutchinson M; Somerville S; Hornbuckle J; Doherty D
    Women Birth; 2020 Feb; 33(1):e39-e47. PubMed ID: 30528817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
    Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
    Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Models of maternity care: evidence for midwifery continuity of care.
    Homer CS
    Med J Aust; 2016 Oct; 205(8):370-374. PubMed ID: 27736625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Caseload midwifery care versus standard maternity care for women of any risk: M@NGO, a randomised controlled trial.
    Tracy SK; Hartz DL; Tracy MB; Allen J; Forti A; Hall B; White J; Lainchbury A; Stapleton H; Beckmann M; Bisits A; Homer C; Foureur M; Welsh A; Kildea S
    Lancet; 2013 Nov; 382(9906):1723-32. PubMed ID: 24050808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.
    Vedam S; Stoll K; Martin K; Rubashkin N; Partridge S; Thordarson D; Jolicoeur G;
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171804. PubMed ID: 28231285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Mobile technologies and communication strategies in an urban Midwifery Group Practice setting. An exploratory study.
    Forti A; Stapleton H; Kildea S
    Women Birth; 2013 Dec; 26(4):235-9. PubMed ID: 24074760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The influence of childbirth expectations on Western Australian women's perceptions of their birth experience.
    Hauck Y; Fenwick J; Downie J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2007 Sep; 23(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 17097202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Investigating the potential for evidence-based midwifery-led services in very remote Australia: viewpoints from local stakeholders.
    Quinn E; Noble J; Seale H; Ward JE
    Women Birth; 2013 Dec; 26(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 24012012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Midwifery care and patient-provider communication in maternity decisions in the United States.
    Kozhimannil KB; Attanasio LB; Yang YT; Avery MD; Declercq E
    Matern Child Health J; 2015 Jul; 19(7):1608-15. PubMed ID: 25874874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Parents' experiences of midwifery students providing continuity of care.
    Aune I; Dahlberg Msc U; Ingebrigtsen O
    Midwifery; 2012 Aug; 28(4):372-8. PubMed ID: 21764190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Autonomous and dependent-The dichotomy of birth: A feminist analysis of birth plans in Sweden.
    Westergren A; Edin K; Walsh D; Christianson M
    Midwifery; 2019 Jan; 68():56-64. PubMed ID: 30366225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Being safe practitioners and safe mothers: a critical ethnography of continuity of care midwifery in Australia.
    Dove S; Muir-Cochrane E
    Midwifery; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1063-72. PubMed ID: 24462189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Choosing a Model of Maternity Care: Decision Support Needs of Australian Women.
    Stevens G; Miller YD; Watson B; Thompson R
    Birth; 2016 Jun; 43(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 26661139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. 'A match made in midwifery': Women's perceptions of student midwife partnerships.
    Jefford E; Nolan SJ; Sansone H; Provost SC
    Women Birth; 2020 Mar; 33(2):193-198. PubMed ID: 30554958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. 'With woman' philosophy: examining the evidence, answering the questions.
    Carolan M; Hodnett E
    Nurs Inq; 2007 Jun; 14(2):140-52. PubMed ID: 17518826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.