These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2600211)

  • 21. An evaluation of the compatibility between aluminium Finn Chambers and various mercurials dissolved in water or dispersed in petrolatum.
    Lachapelle JM; Douka MA
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1985; 33(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 3987516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Validation of a novel epicutaneous delivery system for patch testing of house dust mite-hypersensitive dogs.
    Olivry T; Linder KE; Paps JS; Bizikova P; Dunston S; Donne N; Mondoulet L
    Vet Dermatol; 2012 Dec; 23(6):525-e106. PubMed ID: 23050930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A left versus right side comparative study of Epiquick patch test results in 100 consecutive patients.
    Lachapelle JM
    Contact Dermatitis; 1989 Jan; 20(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 2914436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dosage considerations in patch testing with liquid allergens.
    Shaw DW; Zhai H; Maibach HI; Niklasson B
    Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Aug; 47(2):86-90. PubMed ID: 12423405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new occlusive patch test system comparable to IQ and Finn chambers.
    Sajun Merchant SZ; Vaidya AD; Salvi A; Joshi RS; Mohile RB
    Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol; 2014; 80(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 25035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing.
    Bruze M; Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 May; 56(5):281-5. PubMed ID: 17441852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system.
    Lazarov A; David M; Abraham D; Trattner A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Mar; 56(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 17295688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Concordance and discordance between TRUE Test and Finn Chamber.
    Fernández Vozmediano JM; Hita JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Mar; 42(3):182-3. PubMed ID: 10727183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variations in the quantities of petrolatum applied in patch testing.
    Antoine JL; Lachapelle JM
    Derm Beruf Umwelt; 1988; 36(6):191-4. PubMed ID: 3234271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE Test.
    Ale SI; Maibach HI
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):304-12. PubMed ID: 15209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiple concomitant positive patch test reactions.
    Mitchell JC
    Contact Dermatitis; 1977 Dec; 3(6):315-20. PubMed ID: 606486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Atopy patch test--reproducibility and elicitation of itch in different application sites.
    Weissenbacher S; Bacon T; Targett D; Behrendt H; Ring J; Darsow U
    Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 15823910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Which test chambers should be used for acetone, ethanol, and water solutions when patch testing?
    Isaksson M; Gruvberger B; Frick-Engfeldt M; Bruze M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):134-6. PubMed ID: 17627666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Course of contact allergy in consecutive eczema patients patch tested with TRUE Test panels 1 and 2 at least twice over a 12-year period.
    Jensen CD; Andersen KE
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 May; 52(5):242-6. PubMed ID: 15898996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Path test reactions to the Chinese Standard Screening Allergens in 1,135 patients investigated for allergic contact dermatitis.
    Liu YQ; Zhao B; Zhuang LH; Fan WX
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Sep; 8(3):141-3. PubMed ID: 9249281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The reproducibility of patch tests.
    Bourke JF; Batta K; Prais L; Abdullah A; Foulds IS
    Br J Dermatol; 1999 Jan; 140(1):102-5. PubMed ID: 10215776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concordance of patch test results with four new TRUE test allergens compared with the same allergens from Chemotechnique.
    Andersen KE; Paulsen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jan; 60(1):59. PubMed ID: 19125728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The thin layer rapid use epicutaneous test (TRUE-test), a new patch test method with high accuracy.
    Fischer TI; Maibach HI
    Br J Dermatol; 1985 Jan; 112(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 3970835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reproducibility of the Finn chamber nickel patch test in two different phases of the ovulatory menstrual cycle.
    Aktan S; Aktan E; Inanir I; Kaleli B; Sanli B
    Dermatology; 1998; 197(3):235-7. PubMed ID: 9812027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Different concentrations and volumes of p-phenylenediamine in pet. (equivalent doses) are associated with similar patch test outcomes: a pilot study.
    Andersen F; Hamann CR; Andersen KE; Hamann D; Sager E; Hamann C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 May; 78(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 29392743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.