129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002117)
1. Recent advances in omic technologies for meat quality management.
Picard B; Lebret B; Cassar-Malek I; Liaubet L; Berri C; Le Bihan-Duval E; Hocquette JF; Renand G
Meat Sci; 2015 Nov; 109():18-26. PubMed ID: 26002117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Animal breeding strategies can improve meat quality attributes within entire populations.
Berry DP; Conroy S; Pabiou T; Cromie AR
Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():6-18. PubMed ID: 28515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Breeding and Genetics Symposium: networks and pathways to guide genomic selection.
Snelling WM; Cushman RA; Keele JW; Maltecca C; Thomas MG; Fortes MR; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2013 Feb; 91(2):537-52. PubMed ID: 23097404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome scan for meat quality traits in Nelore beef cattle.
Tizioto PC; Decker JE; Taylor JF; Schnabel RD; Mudadu MA; Silva FL; Mourão GB; Coutinho LL; Tholon P; Sonstegard TS; Rosa AN; Alencar MM; Tullio RR; Medeiros SR; Nassu RT; Feijó GL; Silva LO; Torres RA; Siqueira F; Higa RH; Regitano LC
Physiol Genomics; 2013 Nov; 45(21):1012-20. PubMed ID: 24022219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Molecular approaches in pig breeding to improve meat quality.
Davoli R; Braglia S
Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2007 Dec; 6(4):313-21. PubMed ID: 18208864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expression Marker-Based Strategy to Improve Beef Quality.
Cassar-Malek I; Picard B
ScientificWorldJournal; 2016; 2016():2185323. PubMed ID: 27066527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
Pimentel EC; König S
J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of prediction of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake and carcass and meat quality traits in Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and composite beef cattle.
Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Kemper K; Savin K; Hayes BJ; Barendse W; Zhang Y; Reich CM; Mason BA; Bunch RJ; Harrison BE; Reverter A; Herd RM; Tier B; Graser HU; Goddard ME
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3088-104. PubMed ID: 23658330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Review: Automation and meat quality-global challenges.
Barbut S
Meat Sci; 2014 Jan; 96(1):335-45. PubMed ID: 23933632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships between single nucleotide polymorphisms of the H-FABP gene and slaughter and meat quality traits in chicken.
You X; Liu Y; Jiang X; Du H; Liu Z; Zhu Q
Biochem Genet; 2009 Aug; 47(7-8):511-20. PubMed ID: 19504181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Majorcan Black Pig as a traditional pork production system: improvements in slaughterhouse procedures and elaboration of pork carpaccio as an alternative product.
Gonzalez J; Jaume J; Fàbrega E; Gispert M; Gil M; Oliver A; Llonch P; Guàrdia MD; Realini CE; Arnau J; Tibau J
Meat Sci; 2013 Nov; 95(3):727-32. PubMed ID: 23566686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identification and association of polymorphisms in CAPN1 and CAPN3 candidate genes related to performance and meat quality traits in chickens.
Felício AM; Boschiero C; Balieiro JC; Ledur MC; Ferraz JB; Michelan Filho T; Moura AS; Coutinho LL
Genet Mol Res; 2013 Feb; 12(1):472-82. PubMed ID: 23420372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Proopiomelanocortin gene polymorphisms and its association with meat quality traits by ultrasound measurement in Chinese cattle.
Liu Y; Zan L; Li L; Xin Y
Gene; 2013 Oct; 529(1):138-43. PubMed ID: 23872232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics.
Joo ST; Kim GD; Hwang YH; Ryu YC
Meat Sci; 2013 Dec; 95(4):828-36. PubMed ID: 23702339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification and quantification of flavor attributes present in chicken, lamb, pork, beef, and turkey.
Maughan C; Martini S
J Food Sci; 2012 Feb; 77(2):S115-21. PubMed ID: 22339550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Genetic and phenotypic parameters for carcass and meat quality traits in commercial crossbred pigs.
Miar Y; Plastow GS; Moore SS; Manafiazar G; Charagu P; Kemp RA; Van Haandel B; Huisman AE; Zhang CY; McKay RM; Bruce HL; Wang Z
J Anim Sci; 2014 Jul; 92(7):2869-84. PubMed ID: 24778330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Bayesian models to estimate direct genomic values in multi-breed commercial beef cattle.
Rolf MM; Garrick DJ; Fountain T; Ramey HR; Weaber RL; Decker JE; Pollak EJ; Schnabel RD; Taylor JF
Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):23. PubMed ID: 25884158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reflection on the history, coordination, and funding trends for U.S. public meat research: information to enhance resource allocation.
Miller LR
J Anim Sci; 2002 Aug; 80(8):2085-90. PubMed ID: 12211376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid detection of peptide markers for authentication purposes in raw and cooked meat using ambient liquid extraction surface analysis mass spectrometry.
Montowska M; Alexander MR; Tucker GA; Barrett DA
Anal Chem; 2014 Oct; 86(20):10257-65. PubMed ID: 25259730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A genome-wide scan for selection signatures in Nellore cattle.
Somavilla AL; Sonstegard TS; Higa RH; Rosa AN; Siqueira F; Silva LO; Torres Júnior RA; Coutinho LL; Mudadu MA; Alencar MM; Regitano LC
Anim Genet; 2014 Dec; 45(6):771-81. PubMed ID: 25183526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
