These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002490)

  • 1. The relative importance of heads, bodies, and movement to person recognition across development.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():1-14. PubMed ID: 26002490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Face and body recognition show similar improvement during childhood.
    Bank S; Rhodes G; Read A; Jeffery L
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Sep; 137():1-11. PubMed ID: 25909913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of inversion and familiarity on face versus body cues to person recognition.
    Robbins RA; Coltheart M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Oct; 38(5):1098-104. PubMed ID: 22642217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The movement advantage in famous and unfamiliar faces: a comparison of point-light displays and shape-normalised avatar stimuli.
    Bennetts RJ; Kim J; Burke D; Brooks KR; Lucey S; Saragih J; Robbins RA
    Perception; 2013; 42(9):950-70. PubMed ID: 24386715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Activity in the right fusiform face area predicts the behavioural advantage for the perception of familiar faces.
    Weibert K; Andrews TJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():588-96. PubMed ID: 26187507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adults' Markers of Face Processing Are Present at Age 6 and Are Interconnected Along Development.
    Mardo E; Avidan G; Hadad BS
    Perception; 2018; 47(10-11):1002-1028. PubMed ID: 30217135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Movement cues aid face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia.
    Bennetts RJ; Butcher N; Lander K; Udale R; Bate S
    Neuropsychology; 2015 Nov; 29(6):855-60. PubMed ID: 25822463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognition of face and non-face stimuli in autistic spectrum disorder.
    Arkush L; Smith-Collins AP; Fiorentini C; Skuse DH
    Autism Res; 2013 Dec; 6(6):550-60. PubMed ID: 23894016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No childhood development of viewpoint-invariant face recognition: evidence from 8-year-olds and adults.
    Crookes K; Robbins RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():103-11. PubMed ID: 24907631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults.
    Maguinness C; Newell FN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2266-80. PubMed ID: 25328999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Viewers base estimates of face matching accuracy on their own familiarity: Explaining the photo-ID paradox.
    Ritchie KL; Smith FG; Jenkins R; Bindemann M; White D; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2015 Aug; 141():161-9. PubMed ID: 25988915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facial movements facilitate part-based, not holistic, processing in children, adolescents, and adults.
    Xiao NG; Quinn PC; Ge L; Lee K
    Dev Psychol; 2017 Sep; 53(9):1765-1776. PubMed ID: 28581311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Developmental changes during childhood in single-letter acuity and its crowding by surrounding contours.
    Jeon ST; Hamid J; Maurer D; Lewis TL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Dec; 107(4):423-37. PubMed ID: 20633893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proficient use of low spatial frequencies facilitates face memory but shows protracted maturation throughout adolescence.
    Peters JC; Kemner C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():61-67. PubMed ID: 28732282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
    Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Motion as a cue to face recognition: evidence from congenital prosopagnosia.
    Longmore CA; Tree JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):864-75. PubMed ID: 23391556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental differences in the relative weighing of informants' social attributes.
    Reyes-Jaquez B; Echols CH
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Mar; 49(3):602-13. PubMed ID: 23356527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Getting to know you: The development of mechanisms underlying face learning.
    Matthews CM; Davis EE; Mondloch CJ
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Mar; 167():295-313. PubMed ID: 29220715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
    Bonner L; Burton M
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.