These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002712)

  • 1. Microsurgical decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis: a single-center observational study.
    Giannadakis C; Hammersbøen LE; Feyling C; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Nerland US; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2015 Jul; 157(7):1165-71. PubMed ID: 26002712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Does daily tobacco smoking affect outcomes after microdecompression for degenerative central lumbar spinal stenosis? - A multicenter observational registry-based study.
    Gulati S; Nordseth T; Nerland US; Gulati M; Weber C; Giannadakis C; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Solheim O; Jakola AS
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2015 Jul; 157(7):1157-64. PubMed ID: 25943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is There an Association Between Radiological Severity of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Disability, Pain, or Surgical Outcome?: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Weber C; Giannadakis C; Rao V; Jakola AS; Nerland U; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S; Solheim O
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E78-83. PubMed ID: 26352747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does surgical technique influence clinical outcome after lumbar spinal stenosis decompression? A comparative effectiveness study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Hermansen E; Romild UK; Austevoll IM; Solberg T; Storheim K; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):420-427. PubMed ID: 27262561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Sagittal Balance Does not Influence the 1 Year Clinical Outcome of Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Without Obvious Instability After Microsurgical Decompression.
    Bayerl SH; Pöhlmann F; Finger T; Onken J; Franke J; Czabanka M; Woitzik J; Vajkoczy P
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jul; 40(13):1014-21. PubMed ID: 25893354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Quality of Life and Functional Outcome after Microsurgical Decompression in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: a Register Study].
    Zarghooni K; Beyer F; Papadaki J; Boese CK; Siewe J; Schiffer G; Eysel P; Bredow J
    Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Aug; 155(4):429-434. PubMed ID: 28437825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of obesity on complications and outcomes: a comparison of fusion and nonfusion lumbar spine surgery.
    Onyekwelu I; Glassman SD; Asher AL; Shaffrey CI; Mummaneni PV; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 27740396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Benyamin RM; Staats PS; MiDAS Encore I
    Pain Physician; 2016 May; 19(4):229-42. PubMed ID: 27228511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Postoperative complications after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis, assessment using two different data sources.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Kaur S; Lønne G
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Apr; 166(1):189. PubMed ID: 38653826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical outcome after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with insignificant lower extremity pain. A prospective cohort study from the Norwegian registry for spine surgery.
    Hermansen E; Myklebust TÅ; Austevoll IM; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):36. PubMed ID: 30669998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Individuals Aged 80 and Older: A Multicenter Observational Study.
    Giannadakis C; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Nordseth T; Gulati AM; Nerland US; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2016 Oct; 64(10):2011-2018. PubMed ID: 27611928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does Obesity Affect Outcomes After Decompressive Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis? A Multicenter, Observational, Registry-Based Study.
    Giannadakis C; Nerland US; Solheim O; Jakola AS; Gulati M; Weber C; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK; Gulati S
    World Neurosurg; 2015 Nov; 84(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 26100169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effectiveness of decompression alone compared with additional fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pragmatic comparative non-inferiority observational study from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Brox JI; Solberg TK; Storheim K; Rekeland F; Hermansen E; Indrekvam K; Hellum C
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Feb; 26(2):404-413. PubMed ID: 27421276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical results of microsurgical bilateral decompression via unilateral approach for lumbar canal stenosis with multiple-level involvement.
    Tanaka N; Nakanishi K; Kamei N; Yamamoto R; Nakamae T; Izumi B; Ohta R; Fujioka Y; Ochi M
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():S191-8. PubMed ID: 25192849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.
    Nerland US; Jakola AS; Solheim O; Weber C; Rao V; Lønne G; Solberg TK; Salvesen Ø; Carlsen SM; Nygaard ØP; Gulati S
    BMJ; 2015 Apr; 350():h1603. PubMed ID: 25833966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcomes of multisegmental transforaminal enlarged decompression plus posterior pedicle screw fixation for multilevel lumbar spinal canal stenosis associated with lumbar instability.
    Sun C; Tian WJ; Liu HX; Guan PG
    Int J Surg; 2018 Feb; 50():72-78. PubMed ID: 29329787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictors for failure after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational study.
    Alhaug OK; Dolatowski FC; Solberg TK; Lønne G
    Spine J; 2023 Feb; 23(2):261-270. PubMed ID: 36343913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study-protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing clinical and radiological results after three different posterior decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis: the Spinal Stenosis Trial (SST) (part of the NORDSTEN Study).
    Hermansen E; Austevoll IM; Romild UK; Rekeland F; Solberg T; Storheim K; Grundnes O; Aaen J; Brox JI; Hellum C; Indrekvam K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):121. PubMed ID: 28327114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Inadequacy of 3-month Oswestry Disability Index outcome for assessing individual longer-term patient experience after lumbar spine surgery.
    Asher AL; Chotai S; Devin CJ; Speroff T; Harrell FE; Nian H; Dittus RS; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Glassman SD; Bydon M; Archer KR; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Aug; 25(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 26989974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
    Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.