These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002829)

  • 1. Coalescence vs. concatenation: Sophisticated analyses vs. first principles applied to rooting the angiosperms.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2015 Oct; 91():98-122. PubMed ID: 26002829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of subsampling gene trees on coalescent methods applied to ancient divergences.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Apr; 97():76-89. PubMed ID: 26768112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The gene tree delusion.
    Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):1-33. PubMed ID: 26238460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Coalescent versus concatenation methods and the placement of Amborella as sister to water lilies.
    Xi Z; Liu L; Rest JS; Davis CC
    Syst Biol; 2014 Nov; 63(6):919-32. PubMed ID: 25077515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mutually exclusive phylogenomic inferences at the root of the angiosperms: Amborella is supported as sister and Observed Variability is biased.
    Simmons MP
    Cladistics; 2017 Oct; 33(5):488-512. PubMed ID: 34724761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phylogenetic analysis at deep timescales: unreliable gene trees, bypassed hidden support, and the coalescence/concatalescence conundrum.
    Gatesy J; Springer MS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Nov; 80():231-66. PubMed ID: 25152276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Partitioned coalescence support reveals biases in species-tree methods and detects gene trees that determine phylogenomic conflicts.
    Gatesy J; Sloan DB; Warren JM; Baker RH; Simmons MP; Springer MS
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Oct; 139():106539. PubMed ID: 31226465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots?
    Stefanović S; Rice DW; Palmer JD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 4():35. PubMed ID: 15453916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biases of tree-independent-character-subsampling methods.
    Simmons MP; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jul; 100():424-443. PubMed ID: 27103257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolving Rapid Radiations within Angiosperm Families Using Anchored Phylogenomics.
    Léveillé-Bourret É; Starr JR; Ford BA; Moriarty Lemmon E; Lemmon AR
    Syst Biol; 2018 Jan; 67(1):94-112. PubMed ID: 28472459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gene-tree misrooting drives conflicts in phylogenomic coalescent analyses of palaeognath birds.
    Simmons MP; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2022 Feb; 167():107344. PubMed ID: 34748873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementing and testing the multispecies coalescent model: A valuable paradigm for phylogenomics.
    Edwards SV; Xi Z; Janke A; Faircloth BC; McCormack JE; Glenn TC; Zhong B; Wu S; Lemmon EM; Lemmon AR; Leaché AD; Liu L; Davis CC
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Jan; 94(Pt A):447-62. PubMed ID: 26518740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The root of the angiosperms revisited.
    Zanis MJ; Soltis DE; Soltis PS; Mathews S; Donoghue MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2002 May; 99(10):6848-53. PubMed ID: 12011443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of congruence among gene trees with polytomies using overall success of resolution for phylogenomic coalescent analyses.
    Simmons MP; Goloboff PA; Stöver BC; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Cladistics; 2023 Oct; 39(5):418-436. PubMed ID: 37096985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Another look at the root of the angiosperms reveals a familiar tale.
    Drew BT; Ruhfel BR; Smith SA; Moore MJ; Briggs BG; Gitzendanner MA; Soltis PS; Soltis DE
    Syst Biol; 2014 May; 63(3):368-82. PubMed ID: 24391149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analysis of a Rapid Evolutionary Radiation Using Ultraconserved Elements: Evidence for a Bias in Some Multispecies Coalescent Methods.
    Meiklejohn KA; Faircloth BC; Glenn TC; Kimball RT; Braun EL
    Syst Biol; 2016 Jul; 65(4):612-27. PubMed ID: 26865273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phylogenomic analyses of large-scale nuclear genes provide new insights into the evolutionary relationships within the rosids.
    Zhao L; Li X; Zhang N; Zhang SD; Yi TS; Ma H; Guo ZH; Li DZ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2016 Dec; 105():166-176. PubMed ID: 27369455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Ancestral Gene Flow and Parallel Organellar Genome Capture Result in Extreme Phylogenomic Discord in a Lineage of Angiosperms.
    Folk RA; Mandel JR; Freudenstein JV
    Syst Biol; 2017 May; 66(3):320-337. PubMed ID: 27637567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gene-wise resampling outperforms site-wise resampling in phylogenetic coalescence analyses.
    Simmons MP; Sloan DB; Springer MS; Gatesy J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2019 Feb; 131():80-92. PubMed ID: 30391518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effectiveness of phylogenomic data and coalescent species-tree methods for resolving difficult nodes in the phylogeny of advanced snakes (Serpentes: Caenophidia).
    Pyron RA; Hendry CR; Chou VM; Lemmon EM; Lemmon AR; Burbrink FT
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2014 Dec; 81():221-31. PubMed ID: 25193610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.