157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002872)
1. Mind the Gap: The Effect of Keyboard Key Gap and Pitch on Typing Speed, Accuracy, and Usability, Part 3.
Madison H; Pereira A; Korshøj M; Taylor L; Barr A; Rempel D
Hum Factors; 2015 Nov; 57(7):1188-94. PubMed ID: 26002872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics, Part 2: Vertical spacing.
Pereira A; Hsieh CM; Laroche C; Rempel D
Hum Factors; 2014 Jun; 56(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 25029899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of keyboard key spacing on typing speed, error, usability, and biomechanics: Part 1.
Pereira A; Lee DL; Sadeeshkumar H; Laroche C; Odell D; Rempel D
Hum Factors; 2013 Jun; 55(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 23829030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and evaluation of small, linear QWERTY keyboards.
Hsiao HC; Wu FG; Chen CH
Appl Ergon; 2014 May; 45(3):655-62. PubMed ID: 24075287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of key size of touch screen virtual keyboards on productivity, usability, and typing biomechanics.
Kim JH; Aulck L; Thamsuwan O; Bartha MC; Johnson PW
Hum Factors; 2014 Nov; 56(7):1235-48. PubMed ID: 25490804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An evaluation of the ergonomics of three computer keyboards.
Zecevic A; Miller DI; Harburn K
Ergonomics; 2000 Jan; 43(1):55-72. PubMed ID: 10661693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, wrist posture, typing performance, and self-reported comfort among conventional and ultra-low travel keyboards.
Kia K; Sisley J; Johnson PW; Kim JH
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():10-16. PubMed ID: 30487088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences in typing forces, muscle activity, comfort, and typing performance among virtual, notebook, and desktop keyboards.
Kim JH; Aulck L; Bartha MC; Harper CA; Johnson PW
Appl Ergon; 2014 Nov; 45(6):1406-13. PubMed ID: 24856862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and evaluation of a curved computer keyboard.
McLoone HE; Jacobson M; Clark P; Opina R; Hegg C; Johnson P
Ergonomics; 2009 Dec; 52(12):1529-39. PubMed ID: 19941185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of keyswitch design of desktop and notebook keyboards related to key stiffness and typing force.
Bufton MJ; Marklin RW; Nagurka ML; Simoneau GG
Ergonomics; 2006 Aug; 49(10):996-1012. PubMed ID: 16803729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effect of an alternative keyboard on musculoskeletal discomfort: A randomized cross-over trial.
Baker NA; Moehling KK; Park SY
Work; 2015; 50(4):677-86. PubMed ID: 24284689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Usability study of multiple vibrotactile feedback stimuli in an entire virtual keyboard input.
Kung CH; Hsieh TC; Smith S
Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103270. PubMed ID: 32920221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usage Position and Virtual Keyboard Design Affect Upper-Body Kinematics, Discomfort, and Usability during Prolonged Tablet Typing.
Lin MI; Hong RH; Chang JH; Ke XM
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0143585. PubMed ID: 26629989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of six keyboard designs on wrist and forearm postures.
Rempel D; Barr A; Brafman D; Young E
Appl Ergon; 2007 May; 38(3):293-8. PubMed ID: 16806042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The input efficiency of chord keyboards.
Wu FG; Shi WZ
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2018 Dec; 24(4):638-645. PubMed ID: 28849996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance.
Woods M; Babski-Reeves K
Ergonomics; 2005 Dec; 48(15):1793-808. PubMed ID: 16373317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Design features of alternative computer keyboards: a review of experimental data.
Marklin RW; Simoneau GG
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2004 Oct; 34(10):638-49. PubMed ID: 15552709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of applied forces in alphanumeric keyboard work.
Armstrong TJ; Foulke JA; Martin BJ; Gerson J; Rempel DM
Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1994 Jan; 55(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 8116526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laboratory and in-use assessment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contamination of ergonomic computer keyboards for ward use.
Wilson AP; Ostro P; Magnussen M; Cooper B;
Am J Infect Control; 2008 Dec; 36(10):e19-25. PubMed ID: 19084159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An assessment of alternate keyboards using finger motion, wrist motion and tendon travel.
Treaster DE; Marras WS
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2000 Aug; 15(7):499-503. PubMed ID: 10831809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
