These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26002995)

  • 1. Analysis of substrate competition in regulatory network motifs: Stimulus-response curves, thresholds and ultrasensitivity.
    Straube R
    J Theor Biol; 2015 Sep; 380():74-82. PubMed ID: 26002995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of network motifs in cellular regulation: Structural similarities, input-output relations and signal integration.
    Straube R
    Biosystems; 2017 Dec; 162():215-232. PubMed ID: 29107640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Competition effects shape the response sensitivity and kinetics of phosphorylation cycles in cell signaling.
    Salazar C; Höfer T
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2006 Dec; 1091():517-30. PubMed ID: 17341641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation of the affinities of allosteric ligands using radioligand binding and pharmacological null methods.
    Ehlert FJ
    Mol Pharmacol; 1988 Feb; 33(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 2828914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. gamma-Aminobutyric acid receptor binding in fresh mouse brain membranes at 22 degrees C: ligand-induced changes in affinity.
    Yang JS; Olsen RW
    Mol Pharmacol; 1987 Aug; 32(1):266-77. PubMed ID: 3039341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of models for analysis of radioligand binding data.
    Abramson SN; McGonigle P; Molinoff PB
    Mol Pharmacol; 1987 Jan; 31(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 3027522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of rigid or flexible linkage between two ligands on the effective affinity and avidity for reversible interactions with bivalent receptors.
    Bobrovnik SA
    J Mol Recognit; 2007; 20(4):253-62. PubMed ID: 17847051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of receptor binding displacement curves by a nonhomologous ligand, on the basis of an equivalent competition principle.
    van Zoelen EJ
    Anal Biochem; 1992 Feb; 200(2):393-9. PubMed ID: 1321566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple agonist-affinity states of opioid receptors: regulation of binding by guanyl nucleotides in guinea pig cortical, NG108-15, and 7315c cell membranes.
    Werling LL; Puttfarcken PS; Cox BM
    Mol Pharmacol; 1988 Apr; 33(4):423-31. PubMed ID: 2833686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two compartmental models for describing receptor ligand kinetics and receptor availability in multiple injection PET studies.
    Morris ED; Alpert NM; Fischman AJ
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1996 Sep; 16(5):841-53. PubMed ID: 8784229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Thresholds and ultrasensitivity from negative cooperativity.
    Ha SH; Ferrell JE
    Science; 2016 May; 352(6288):990-3. PubMed ID: 27174675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonequilibrium analysis alters the mechanistic interpretation of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by peripheral site ligands.
    Szegletes T; Mallender WD; Rosenberry TL
    Biochemistry; 1998 Mar; 37(12):4206-16. PubMed ID: 9521743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Operating regimes of covalent modification cycles at high enzyme concentrations.
    Straube R
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Oct; 431():39-48. PubMed ID: 28782551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of the rabbit ventricular myocardial receptor for angiotensin II. Evidence for two sites of different affinities and specificities.
    Wright GB; Alexander RW; Ekstein LS; Gimbrone MA
    Mol Pharmacol; 1983 Sep; 24(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 6310363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equilibrium competition binding assay: inhibition mechanism from a single dose response.
    Huang X
    J Theor Biol; 2003 Dec; 225(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 14604589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ligand-receptor interactions: detailed evaluation of occupancy-dependent affinity.
    Faguet GB
    J Cell Biochem; 1986; 31(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 3013909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evidence for agonist-induced interaction of angiotensin receptor with a guanine nucleotide-binding protein in bovine adrenal zona glomerulosa.
    De Léan A; Ong H; Gutkowska J; Schiller PW; McNicoll N
    Mol Pharmacol; 1984 Nov; 26(3):498-508. PubMed ID: 6092899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of multiple ligand binding on kinetic isotope effects in PQQ-dependent methanol dehydrogenase.
    Hothi P; Basran J; Sutcliffe MJ; Scrutton NS
    Biochemistry; 2003 Apr; 42(13):3966-78. PubMed ID: 12667088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A general technique to rank protein-ligand binding affinities and determine allosteric versus direct binding site competition in compound mixtures.
    Annis DA; Nazef N; Chuang CC; Scott MP; Nash HM
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(47):15495-503. PubMed ID: 15563178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Steady-states of receptor-ligand dynamics: a theoretical framework.
    Chaves M; Sontag ED; Dinerstein RJ
    J Theor Biol; 2004 Apr; 227(3):413-28. PubMed ID: 15019508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.