These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2600300)

  • 1. Apparent auditory deprivation effects of late onset: the role of presentation level.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Dec; 86(6):2103-6. PubMed ID: 2600300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses: evidence from monaural fitting of hearing aids.
    Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Sep; 92(3):1258-68. PubMed ID: 1401514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Late-onset auditory deprivation: effects of monaural versus binaural hearing aids.
    Silman S; Gelfand SA; Silverman CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1357-62. PubMed ID: 6512097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Onset of auditory deprivation.
    Hurley RM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999; 10(10):529-34. PubMed ID: 10613349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Audibility and speech perception of children using wide dynamic range compression hearing AIDS.
    Davidson LS; Skinner MW
    Am J Audiol; 2006 Dec; 15(2):141-53. PubMed ID: 17182879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies.
    Snik FM; Teunissen B; Cremers WR
    Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory deprivation and recovery in adults with asymmetric sensorineural hearing impairment.
    Silverman CA; Emmer MB
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Sep; 4(5):338-46. PubMed ID: 8219301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Relations between pure-tone threshold and discrimination of monosyllables in inner ear high-frequency hearing disorders].
    Battmer RD; Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1984 Feb; 32(2):69-73. PubMed ID: 6706703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes in intensity discrimination following monaural long-term use of a hearing aid.
    Robinson K; Gatehouse S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1183-90. PubMed ID: 7876440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Audiological and subjective benefit results in bone-anchored hearing device users.
    Boleas-Aguirre MS; Bulnes Plano MD; de Erenchun Lasa IR; Ibáñez Beroiz B
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):494-503. PubMed ID: 22472615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech-in-noise perception in unilateral hearing loss: Relation to pure-tone thresholds and brainstem plasticity.
    Vannson N; James CJ; Fraysse B; Lescure B; Strelnikov K; Deguine O; Barone P; Marx M
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Jul; 102():135-143. PubMed ID: 28623107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds.
    Sardari S; Jafari Z; Haghani H; Talebi H
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):134-41. PubMed ID: 26385486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluation of deprivation manifestations of the auditory system in patients with unilateral middle ear deafness before and after surgical therapy].
    Vorwerk U; Penk S; Brosz M; Begall K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Apr; 75(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 8688124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of aided hearing in the nonimplanted ear on bimodal hearing.
    Jang JH; Lee JH; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Dec; 35(10):e270-6. PubMed ID: 25153664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Acclimatization to hearing aids.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):203-12. PubMed ID: 24351612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hearing loss in children with otitis media with effusion: a systematic review.
    Cai T; McPherson B
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Feb; 56(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 27841699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preoperative functional assessment of auditory cortex in adult cochlear implant users.
    Roland PS; Tobey EA; Devous MD
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 11192903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Long-term effects of hearing aids on word recognition scores.
    Song JE; Tanaka SM; Pinto JM; Rasmussen B; Ferro LM; Saadia-Redleaf MI
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2011 May; 120(5):314-9. PubMed ID: 21675587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.