These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26003053)
1. Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results. Taber JM; Klein WM; Ferrer RA; Han PK; Lewis KL; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB J Behav Med; 2015 Oct; 38(5):715-26. PubMed ID: 26003053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dispositional optimism and perceived risk interact to predict intentions to learn genome sequencing results. Taber JM; Klein WM; Ferrer RA; Lewis KL; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB Health Psychol; 2015 Jul; 34(7):718-28. PubMed ID: 25313897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19. Simonovic N; Taber JM J Behav Med; 2022 Apr; 45(2):159-171. PubMed ID: 34811623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Individual differences in aversion to ambiguity regarding medical tests and treatments: association with cancer screening cognitions. Han PK; Williams AE; Haskins A; Gutheil C; Lucas FL; Klein WM; Mazor KM Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2014 Dec; 23(12):2916-23. PubMed ID: 25258015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Information Avoidance Tendencies, Threat Management Resources, and Interest in Genetic Sequencing Feedback. Taber JM; Klein WM; Ferrer RA; Lewis KL; Harris PR; Shepperd JA; Biesecker LG Ann Behav Med; 2015 Aug; 49(4):616-21. PubMed ID: 25582989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors Affecting Physicians' Intentions to Communicate Personalized Prognostic Information to Cancer Patients at the End of Life: An Experimental Vignette Study. Han PK; Dieckmann NF; Holt C; Gutheil C; Peters E Med Decis Making; 2016 Aug; 36(6):703-13. PubMed ID: 26985015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Communicating Scientific Uncertainty About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Online Experimental Study of an Uncertainty-Normalizing Strategy. Han PKJ; Scharnetzki E; Scherer AM; Thorpe A; Lary C; Waterston LB; Fagerlin A; Dieckmann NF J Med Internet Res; 2021 Apr; 23(4):e27832. PubMed ID: 33769947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is luck on my side? Optimism, pessimism, and ambiguity aversion. Pulford BD Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1079-87. PubMed ID: 19145538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Physicians' attitudes about communicating and managing scientific uncertainty differ by perceived ambiguity aversion of their patients. Portnoy DB; Han PK; Ferrer RA; Klein WM; Clauser SB Health Expect; 2013 Dec; 16(4):362-72. PubMed ID: 21838835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. When bins blur: Patient perspectives on categories of results from clinical whole genome sequencing. Jamal L; Robinson JO; Christensen KD; Blumenthal-Barby J; Slashinski MJ; Perry DL; Vassy JL; Wycliff J; Green RC; McGuire AL AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 28949844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. Facio FM; Eidem H; Fisher T; Brooks S; Linn A; Kaphingst KA; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB Eur J Hum Genet; 2013 Mar; 21(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22892536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence of the properties of an ambiguity tolerance measure: the Multiple Stimulus Types Ambiguity Tolerance Scale-II (MSTAT-II). McLain DL Psychol Rep; 2009 Dec; 105(3 Pt 1):975-88. PubMed ID: 20099561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence that perceptions of and tolerance for medical ambiguity are distinct constructs: An analysis of nationally representative US data. Simonovic N; Taber JM; Klein WMP; Ferrer RA Health Expect; 2020 Jun; 23(3):603-613. PubMed ID: 32097530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors. Han PK; Klein WM; Lehman T; Killam B; Massett H; Freedman AN Med Decis Making; 2011; 31(2):354-66. PubMed ID: 20671211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reactions to clinical reinterpretation of a gene variant by participants in a sequencing study. Taber JM; Klein WMP; Lewis KL; Johnston JJ; Biesecker LG; Biesecker BB Genet Med; 2018 Mar; 20(3):337-345. PubMed ID: 28771245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Learning about the Ellsberg Paradox reduces, but does not abolish, ambiguity aversion. Jia R; Furlong E; Gao S; Santos LR; Levy I PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0228782. PubMed ID: 32130214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disclosure of cardiac variants of uncertain significance results in an exome cohort. Lawal TA; Lewis KL; Johnston JJ; Heidlebaugh AR; Ng D; Gaston-Johansson FG; Klein WMP; Biesecker BB; Biesecker LG Clin Genet; 2018 May; 93(5):1022-1029. PubMed ID: 29383714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PUGS: A novel scale to assess perceptions of uncertainties in genome sequencing. Biesecker BB; Woolford SW; Klein WMP; Brothers KB; Umstead KL; Lewis KL; Biesecker LG; Han PKJ Clin Genet; 2017 Aug; 92(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 27925165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Five-year-olds do not show ambiguity aversion in a risk and ambiguity task with physical objects. Li R; Roberts RC; Huettel SA; Brannon EM J Exp Child Psychol; 2017 Jul; 159():319-326. PubMed ID: 28359540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Perceived ambiguity about cancer prevention recommendations: relationship to perceptions of cancer preventability, risk, and worry. Han PK; Moser RP; Klein WM J Health Commun; 2006; 11 Suppl 1(0 1):51-69. PubMed ID: 16641074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]