These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26003657)

  • 21. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts.
    Hodes-Wertz B; Noyes N; Mullin C; McCaffrey C; Grifo JA
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Jul; 23(1):118-23. PubMed ID: 21550305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Live birth rates and perinatal outcomes when all embryos are frozen compared with conventional fresh and frozen embryo transfer: a cohort study of 337,148 in vitro fertilisation cycles.
    Smith ADAC; Tilling K; Lawlor DA; Nelson SM
    BMC Med; 2019 Nov; 17(1):202. PubMed ID: 31718643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of cryopreservation on perinatal outcome after blastocyst- vs cleavage-stage embryo transfer: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Alviggi C; Conforti A; Carbone IF; Borrelli R; de Placido G; Guerriero S
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 51(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 29077229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Fresh versus frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in high responders.
    Kalem Z; Namli Kalem M; Ruso H; Bakirarar B; Gurgan T
    Ginekol Pol; 2018; 89(8):407-413. PubMed ID: 30215458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Longitudinal surface measurements of human blastocysts show that the dynamics of blastocoel expansion are associated with fertilization method and ongoing pregnancy.
    van Marion ES; Chavli EA; Laven JSE; Steegers-Theunissen RPM; Koster MPH; Baart EB
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2022 Mar; 20(1):53. PubMed ID: 35305653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Study protocol: E-freeze - freezing of embryos in assisted conception: a randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of a policy of freezing embryos followed by thawed frozen embryo transfer compared with a policy of fresh embryo transfer, in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation.
    Maheshwari A; Bhattacharya S; Bowler U; Brison D; Child T; Cole C; Coomarasamy A; Cutting R; Harbottle S; Hardy P; Juszczak E; Khalaf Y; Kurinczuk JJ; Lavery S; Lewis-Jones C; Macklon N; Raine-Fenning NJ; Rajkohwa M; Scotland G; Troup S
    Reprod Health; 2019 Jun; 16(1):81. PubMed ID: 31196113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Association between blastocyst morphology and pregnancy and perinatal outcomes following fresh and cryopreserved embryo transfer.
    Bakkensen JB; Brady P; Carusi D; Romanski P; Thomas AM; Racowsky C
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Nov; 36(11):2315-2324. PubMed ID: 31512049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cumulative live birth rates after one ART cycle including all subsequent frozen-thaw cycles in 1050 women: secondary outcome of an RCT comparing GnRH-antagonist and GnRH-agonist protocols.
    Toftager M; Bogstad J; Løssl K; Prætorius L; Zedeler A; Bryndorf T; Nilas L; Pinborg A
    Hum Reprod; 2017 Mar; 32(3):556-567. PubMed ID: 28130435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Ciapponi A; Cornelisse S; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 May; 5(5):CD002118. PubMed ID: 35588094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Emergency IVF for embryo freezing to preserve female fertility: a French multicentre cohort study.
    Courbiere B; Decanter C; Bringer-Deutsch S; Rives N; Mirallié S; Pech JC; De Ziegler D; Carré-Pigeon F; May-Panloup P; Sifer C; Amice V; Schweitzer T; Porcu-Buisson G; Poirot C;
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Sep; 28(9):2381-8. PubMed ID: 23832792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What is the reproductive potential of day 7 euploid embryos?
    Hernandez-Nieto C; Lee JA; Slifkin R; Sandler B; Copperman AB; Flisser E
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1697-1706. PubMed ID: 31398251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
    Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A flexible protocol for cryopreservation of pronuclear and cleavage stage embryos created by conventional in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Amarin ZO
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Dec; 117(2):189-93. PubMed ID: 15541856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of the natural cycle and vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer results in better in-vitro fertilization outcomes : cycle regimens of vitrification thawed blastocyst transfer.
    Chang EM; Han JE; Kim YS; Lyu SW; Lee WS; Yoon TK
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2011 Apr; 28(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 21229386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Selection of embryos for day-3 transfer at the pronuclear-stage and pronuclear-stage cryopreservation results in high delivery rates in fresh and frozen cycles.
    Hammitt DG; Sattler CA; Manes ML; Singh AP
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2004 Jul; 21(7):271-8. PubMed ID: 15526985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?
    Drakopoulos P; Blockeel C; Stoop D; Camus M; de Vos M; Tournaye H; Polyzos NP
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):370-6. PubMed ID: 26724797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos.
    Ho JR; Woo I; Louie K; Salem W; Jabara SI; Bendikson KA; Paulson RJ; Chung K
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2017 Oct; 34(10):1359-1366. PubMed ID: 28718080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Successful pregnancy resulting from cryopreserved pronuclear and cleaved embryos thawed and cultured to blastocysts, refrozen and transferred. A case report.
    Estes SJ; Laky DC; Hoover LM; Smith SE; Schinfeld JS; Somkuti SG
    J Reprod Med; 2003 Jan; 48(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 12611095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.
    Glujovsky D; Farquhar C; Quinteiro Retamar AM; Alvarez Sedo CR; Blake D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2016 Jun; (6):CD002118. PubMed ID: 27357126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fresh transfer of Day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded Day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach?
    Tannus S; Cohen Y; Henderson S; Al Ma'mari N; Shavit T; Son WY; Dahan MH
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 34(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 30517719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.