216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26003915)
1. Conflict adaptation within but not across NoGo decision criteria: Event-related-potential evidence of specificity in the contextual modulation of cognitive control.
Feldman JL; Clark SL; Freitas AL
Biol Psychol; 2015 Jul; 109():132-40. PubMed ID: 26003915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.
Freitas AL; Banai R; Clark SL
Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1226-33. PubMed ID: 19572903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1953-61. PubMed ID: 21435347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.
Gonzalez-Rosa JJ; Inuggi A; Blasi V; Cursi M; Annovazzi P; Comi G; Falini A; Leocani L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Jul; 89(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 23664841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural mechanisms underlying conflict monitoring over risky decision alternatives: evidence from ERP in a Go/Nogo task.
Wang S; Hui N; Zhou X; He K; Yu Y; Shuai J
J Integr Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 13(3):497-508. PubMed ID: 25164361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differential modulation of the N2 and P3 event-related potentials by response conflict and inhibition.
Groom MJ; Cragg L
Brain Cogn; 2015 Jul; 97():1-9. PubMed ID: 25955278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.
Jonkman LM
Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1097(1):181-93. PubMed ID: 16729977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative analysis of event-related potentials during Go/NoGo and CPT: decomposition of electrophysiological markers of response inhibition and sustained attention.
Kirmizi-Alsan E; Bayraktaroglu Z; Gurvit H; Keskin YH; Emre M; Demiralp T
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1104(1):114-28. PubMed ID: 16824492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of task complexity on ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks.
Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Mar; 87(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 22906814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sequence effects support the conflict theory of N2 and P3 in the Go/NoGo task.
Smith JL; Smith EA; Provost AL; Heathcote A
Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Mar; 75(3):217-26. PubMed ID: 19951723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electrophysiological underpinnings of response variability in the Go/NoGo task.
Karamacoska D; Barry RJ; Steiner GZ
Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Dec; 134():159-167. PubMed ID: 30266622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Psychophysiology; 2012 May; 49(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 22292850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Conflict and inhibition in the cued-Go/NoGo task.
Randall WM; Smith JL
Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Dec; 122(12):2400-7. PubMed ID: 21715225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development of neural mechanisms in emotional conflict adaptation: A comparison of children, adolescents, and young adults.
Li D; Liu T; Shi J
Neuropsychology; 2019 Feb; 33(2):222-233. PubMed ID: 30667252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential processing in the equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: children vs. adults.
Barry RJ; De Blasio FM; Borchard JP
Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Oct; 125(10):1995-2006. PubMed ID: 24661623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of repetition priming on electrophysiological and behavioral indices of conflict adaptation and cognitive control.
Clayson PE; Larson MJ
Psychophysiology; 2011 Dec; 48(12):1621-30. PubMed ID: 21806636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decomposing N2 NOGO wave of event-related potentials into independent components.
Kropotov JD; Ponomarev VA
Neuroreport; 2009 Dec; 20(18):1592-6. PubMed ID: 19904220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response priming in the Go/NoGo task: the N2 reflects neither inhibition nor conflict.
Smith JL; Johnstone SJ; Barry RJ
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Feb; 118(2):343-55. PubMed ID: 17140848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conflict monitoring and adaptation as reflected by N2 amplitude in obsessive-compulsive disorder.
Riesel A; Klawohn J; Kathmann N; Endrass T
Psychol Med; 2017 Jun; 47(8):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 28095945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sex differences in equiprobable auditory Go/NoGo task: effects on N2 and P3.
Melynyte S; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1565-1574. PubMed ID: 28258436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
