These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26005427)

  • 1. An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.
    Wang Z; Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Yu X; Sun YH; Liu J; Pascalis O; Ge L; Lee K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():559. PubMed ID: 26005427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cultural Differences in the Time Course of Configural and Featural Processing for Own-race Faces.
    Wang H; Qiu R; Li W; Li S; Fu S
    Neuroscience; 2020 Oct; 446():157-170. PubMed ID: 32891705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Erratum: An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.
    Frontiers Production Office
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():1517. PubMed ID: 26483751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.
    Tanaka JW; Quinn PC; Xu B; Maynard K; Huxtable N; Lee K; Pascalis O
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Aug; 124():36-49. PubMed ID: 24747157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.
    Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Lee K; Pascalis O; Slater AM
    Vis cogn; 2013 Jan; 21(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 24093003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Holistic processing, contact, and the other-race effect in face recognition.
    Zhao M; Hayward WG; Bülthoff I
    Vision Res; 2014 Dec; 105():61-9. PubMed ID: 25255992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An investigation on the face inversion effect in deaf children.
    Zhang Y; He H; Yi L
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39153471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Training with own-race faces can improve processing of other-race faces: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia.
    DeGutis J; DeNicola C; Zink T; McGlinchey R; Milberg W
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jul; 49(9):2505-13. PubMed ID: 21570991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Infants' Processing of Featural and Configural Information in the Upper and Lower Halves of the Face.
    Quinn PC; Tanaka JW
    Infancy; 2009 Jul; 14(4):474-487. PubMed ID: 32693451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition.
    Hancock KJ; Rhodes G
    Br J Psychol; 2008 Feb; 99(Pt 1):45-56. PubMed ID: 17535471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of processing facial identity based on features versus their spacing.
    Maurer D; O'Craven KM; Le Grand R; Mondloch CJ; Springer MV; Lewis TL; Grady CL
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Apr; 45(7):1438-51. PubMed ID: 17204295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Processes underlying the cross-race effect: an investigation of holistic, featural, and relational processing of own-race versus other-race faces.
    Mondloch CJ; Elms N; Maurer D; Rhodes G; Hayward WG; Tanaka JW; Zhou G
    Perception; 2010; 39(8):1065-85. PubMed ID: 20942358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Emotion recognition: the role of featural and configural face information.
    Bombari D; Schmid PC; Schmid Mast M; Birri S; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2426-42. PubMed ID: 23679155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.