These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26005974)
1. Factors associated with intraoperative conversion during robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Chow GK; Hertzig LL; Clifton M; Elliott DS Int Braz J Urol; 2015; 41(2):319-24. PubMed ID: 26005974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors Influencing Selection of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, or Robotic Surgery to Treat Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Gebhart JB Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(4):236-42. PubMed ID: 26945273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. First report comparing the two types of single-incision robotic sacrocolpopexy: Single site using the da Vinci Xi or Si system and single port using the da Vinci SP system. Lee SR; Roh AM; Jeong K; Kim SH; Chae HD; Moon HS Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 60(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 33495010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term quality of life outcomes and retreatment rates after robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Chow GK; Elliott DS Int J Urol; 2015 Dec; 22(12):1155-8. PubMed ID: 26300382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative Perioperative Pain and Recovery in Women Undergoing Vaginal Reconstruction Versus Robotic Sacrocolpopexy. Westermann LB; Crisp CC; Mazloomdoost D; Kleeman SD; Pauls RN Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 28067743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy. Belsante M; Murray S; Dillon B; Zimmern P Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6656-61. PubMed ID: 23433141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Anatomic Outcomes of Robotic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy and Concurrent Sacrocolpopexy at a Tertiary Care Institution at Initial Adaptation of the Procedure. Prendergast E; Silver H; Johnson LL; Simon M; Feinglass J; Kielb S; Hairston J; Lewicky-Gaupp C Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 26680565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the learning curve of robotic sacrocolpopexy. Linder BJ; Anand M; Weaver AL; Woelk JL; Klingele CJ; Trabuco EC; Occhino JA; Gebhart JB Int Urogynecol J; 2016 Feb; 27(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 26294206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perioperative Complications and Cost of Vaginal, Open Abdominal, and Robotic Surgery for Apical Vaginal Vault Prolapse. Anand M; Weaver AL; Fruth KM; Borah BJ; Klingele CJ; Gebhart JB Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 27682746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution. Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. White WM; Pickens RB; Elder RF; Firoozi F Urol Clin North Am; 2014 Nov; 41(4):549-57. PubMed ID: 25306166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The anatomical outcome of robotic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of obese and non-obese patients. Azadi A; Francis SL; Taylor KC; Diaz SI; Pasic R; Yeganeh T; Ostergard DR Surg Technol Int; 2014 Mar; 24():249-52. PubMed ID: 24700227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh. Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution]. Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after robotic and abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Siddiqui NY; Geller EJ; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 May; 206(5):435.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22397900 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women. Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of Robotic Procedural Times Using Colpassist Versus End-to-End Anastomosis Sizer for Robotic-Assisted Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Brueseke T; Matthews C; Willis-Gray M; Knight S; Nieto ML; Geller E Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(2):e12-e17. PubMed ID: 30807429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]