These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26008765)

  • 1. Editorial.
    Weisse T
    Eur J Protistol; 2015 Apr; 51(2):A1-2. PubMed ID: 26008765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
    Saper CB; Maunsell JH
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(3):435-6. PubMed ID: 19222555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-blinded manuscript review: Avoiding peer review bias.
    Santos A; Morris DS; Rattan R; Zakrison T
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2021 Jul; 91(1):e39-e42. PubMed ID: 33901050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Data publishing and scientific journals: the future of the scientific paper in a world of shared data.
    De Schutter E
    Neuroinformatics; 2010 Oct; 8(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 20835853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Too much of a good thing….
    Julian T
    J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peer review. Editorial.
    Kenyon G; Youngs R
    J Laryngol Otol; 2009 Dec; 123(12):1299-300. PubMed ID: 19958561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rumors of the Demise of Peer Review are Premature.
    Kravitz RL; Feldman MD
    J Gen Intern Med; 2015 Dec; 30(12):1717-21. PubMed ID: 26407592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2002 Jul; 418(6895):264. PubMed ID: 12124587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scholarship: Beyond the paper.
    Priem J
    Nature; 2013 Mar; 495(7442):437-40. PubMed ID: 23538811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
    Pravinkumar E
    Lancet; 2003 Aug; 362(9385):747. PubMed ID: 12957106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7074):252. PubMed ID: 16421533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Publishing in a peer-reviewed journal.
    Downer M
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 12688596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experts plan to reclaim the web for pop science.
    Butler D
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7076):516-7. PubMed ID: 16452941
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. All the sourcing not fit to print: citing electronic material in your article.
    Rice J
    Chest; 2008 Jun; 133(6):1524-1526. PubMed ID: 18574300
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7123):9. PubMed ID: 17203032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rewarding reviewers, tracking our authors and selective electronic publication.
    Harris JP
    ANZ J Surg; 2017 Apr; 87(4):217-218. PubMed ID: 28371034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Journals: how to decide what's worth publishing.
    Jefferson T; Shashok K
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6920):209-10. PubMed ID: 12529609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.