These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

323 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26009924)

  • 1. Influence of Alveolar Bone Loss and Different Alloys on the Biomechanical Behavior of Internal-and External-Connection Implants: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Lympoudi E; Michalakis K; Giannopoulos D; Michailidis N; Pissiotis A; Fytanidis D; Kugiumtzis D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):e30-42. PubMed ID: 26009924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Behaviors of Implants with Different Connections, Lengths, and Diameters Placed in the Maxillary Anterior Region.
    Borie E; Orsi IA; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 26478969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of platform connection and abutment material on stress distribution in single anterior implant-supported restorations: a nonlinear 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Carvalho MA; Sotto-Maior BS; Del Bel Cury AA; Pessanha Henriques GE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1096-102. PubMed ID: 24831744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical effect of platform switching in implant dentistry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):295-304. PubMed ID: 20369087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Influence of Bone Quality on the Biomechanical Behavior of a Tooth-Implant Fixed Partial Denture: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Giannopoulos D; Savvakis S; Michailidis N; Lympoudi E; Fytanidis D; Pissiotis A; Michalakis K
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):e143-e154. PubMed ID: 27861651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Segundo RM; Oshima HM; da Silva IN; Burnett LH; Mota EG; Silva LL
    Stomatologija; 2009; 11(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 19773629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical effect of a zirconia dental implant-crown system: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Chang CL; Chen CS; Yeung TC; Hsu ML
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(4):e49-57. PubMed ID: 22848900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of increased crown height on stress distribution in short dental implant components and their surrounding bone: A finite element analysis.
    Bulaqi HA; Mousavi Mashhadi M; Safari H; Samandari MM; Geramipanah F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):548-57. PubMed ID: 25794917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of titanium and yttrium-stabilized zirconium dioxide abutments and implants.
    Çaglar A; Bal BT; Karakoca S; Aydın C; Yılmaz H; Sarısoy S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):961-9. PubMed ID: 22010077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A finite element analysis of two different dental implants: stress distribution in the prosthesis, abutment, implant, and supporting bone.
    Quaresma SE; Cury PR; Sendyk WR; Sendyk C
    J Oral Implantol; 2008; 34(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18390236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of implant connection and restoration design (screwed vs. cemented) in reliability and failure modes of anterior crowns.
    Freitas AC; Bonfante EA; Rocha EP; Silva NR; Marotta L; Coelho PG
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Aug; 119(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21726295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
    J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of abutment screw preload in two implant connection systems: A 3D finite element study.
    Jung WK; Lee WS; Kwon HB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):474.e1-474.e8. PubMed ID: 31590980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implant-supported fixed restorations by finite element analysis.
    Tekin S; Değer Y; Demirci F
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 31489862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical Effect of Prosthetic Connection and Implant Body Shape in Low-Quality Bone of Maxillary Posterior Single Implant-Supported Restorations.
    de Andrade CL; Carvalho MA; Del Bel Cury AA; Sotto-Maior BS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):e92-7. PubMed ID: 27447166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stress distribution in the abutment and retention screw of a single implant supporting a prosthesis with platform switching.
    Alvarez-Arenal A; Segura-Mori L; Gonzalez-Gonzalez I; Gago A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(3):e112-21. PubMed ID: 23748329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
    Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
    Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.