These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26010422)

  • 1. Estimation of treatment effect in a subpopulation: An empirical Bayes approach.
    Shen C; Li X; Jeong J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2016; 26(3):507-18. PubMed ID: 26010422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interval estimation of a population mean using existing knowledge or data on effect sizes.
    Shen C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1703-1715. PubMed ID: 29734870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjusting for selection bias in assessing treatment effect estimates from multiple subgroups.
    Glimm E
    Biom J; 2019 Jan; 61(1):216-229. PubMed ID: 30474240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quasi-empirical Bayes methodology for improving meta-analysis.
    Saleh AK; Hassanein KM; Hassanein RS; Kim HM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2006; 16(1):77-90. PubMed ID: 16440838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sharp simultaneous confidence intervals for the means of selected populations with application to microarray data analysis.
    Qiu J; Hwang JT
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):767-76. PubMed ID: 17403105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Treatment effect heterogeneity for univariate subgroups in clinical trials: Shrinkage, standardization, or else.
    Varadhan R; Wang SJ
    Biom J; 2016 Jan; 58(1):133-53. PubMed ID: 26485117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using empirical Bayes methods in biopharmaceutical research.
    Louis TA
    Stat Med; 1991 Jun; 10(6):811-27; discussion 828-9. PubMed ID: 1876774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identification of subpopulations with distinct treatment benefit rate using the Bayesian tree.
    Shen C; Hu Y; Li X; Wang Y; Chen PS; Buxton AE
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1357-1375. PubMed ID: 27356196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Empirical Bayes estimation and inference for the random effects model with binary response.
    Waclawiw MA; Liang KY
    Stat Med; 1994 Mar 15-Apr 15; 13(5-7):541-51. PubMed ID: 8023034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exact confidence intervals for the average causal effect on a binary outcome.
    Li X; Ding P
    Stat Med; 2016 Mar; 35(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 26833798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data.
    Liu C; Shen W; Xie J
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Joint distribution approaches to simultaneously quantifying benefit and risk.
    Shaffer ML; Watterberg KL
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Oct; 6():48. PubMed ID: 17038184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How do we draw inference from "negative" studies?
    Schriger DL
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Jan; 41(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 12514684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sample size estimation in single-arm clinical trials with multiple testing under frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Zaslavsky BG; Scott J
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(4):819-35. PubMed ID: 22651117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Empirical Bayes models of Poisson clinical trials and sample size determination.
    Zaslavsky BG
    Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 19513984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Inference and sample size calculation for clinical trials with incomplete observations of paired binary outcomes.
    Zhang S; Cao J; Ahn C
    Stat Med; 2017 Feb; 36(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 27862151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The problem of model selection uncertainty in structural equation modeling.
    Preacher KJ; Merkle EC
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22268762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Innovations in bayes and empirical bayes methods: estimating parameters, populations and ranks.
    Louis TA; Shen W
    Stat Med; 1999 Sep 15-30; 18(17-18):2493-505. PubMed ID: 10474155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Empirical shrinkage estimator for consistency assessment of treatment effects in multi-regional clinical trials.
    Quan H; Li M; Shih WJ; Ouyang SP; Chen J; Zhang J; Zhao PL
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(10):1691-706. PubMed ID: 22855311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.