185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26010631)
1. The Eighth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: A call for research.
Rennie D; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
JAMA; 2015 May; 313(20):2031-2. PubMed ID: 26010631
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Eighth international congress on peer review in biomedical publication.
Rennie D; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2411. PubMed ID: 26012586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Study design, publication outcome, and funding of research presented at international congresses on peer review and biomedical publication.
Malički M; von Elm E; Marušić A
JAMA; 2014 Mar; 311(10):1065-7. PubMed ID: 24618970
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication: A Call for Research.
Ioannidis JPA; Berkwits M; Flanagin A; Godlee F; Bloom T
JAMA; 2019 Nov; 322(17):1658-1660. PubMed ID: 31524942
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigator balkanization.
Johnston SC; Hauser SL
Ann Neurol; 2008 Sep; 64(3):A11-2. PubMed ID: 18825670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology.
Wong VS
J Child Neurol; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 20606060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Editorial.
Lash GE
Placenta; 2019 Sep; 84():1. PubMed ID: 31113674
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. How to review a manuscript.
Spigt M; Arts IC
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Dec; 63(12):1385-90. PubMed ID: 20971423
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Research collaborations: trial, trust, and truth.
Hanawalt PC
Cell; 2006 Sep; 126(5):823-5. PubMed ID: 16959557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How masked is the "masked peer review" of abstracts submitted to international medical conferences?
Falagas ME; Zouglakis GM; Kavvadia PK
Mayo Clin Proc; 2006 May; 81(5):705. PubMed ID: 16706269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomedical publishing. Secretive and subjective, peer review proves resistant to study.
Couzin-Frankel J
Science; 2013 Sep; 341(6152):1331. PubMed ID: 24052283
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Editorial.
Stockbrugger R; Lebrec D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2013 Jan; 25(1):1. PubMed ID: 23196723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The peer review congresses: improving peer review and biomedical publication.
Steinbrook R
JAMA; 2013 Nov; 310(17):1799-800. PubMed ID: 24126455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Returning home.
Barbacid M
Cell; 2007 May; 129(4):641-4. PubMed ID: 17512394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Striving for a more perfect peer review: editors confront strengths, flaws of biomedical literature.
Kuehn BM
JAMA; 2013 Nov; 310(17):1781-3. PubMed ID: 24193063
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A landmark for the Iranian biomedical community: the first Iranian Annual Congress on Progress in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.
Samadikuchaksaraei A; Joghataei MT
Artif Organs; 2013 Jul; 37(7):591-2. PubMed ID: 23834628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Journal transfer made easy.
Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 15632939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Onwards and upwards.
Lancet Neurol; 2005 Oct; 4(10):587. PubMed ID: 16168922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Responsiveness in the review of scientific articles for publication].
Ventura AG
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2009; 72(4):573; author reply 573. PubMed ID: 19820805
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
