These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26010829)

  • 1. Dissociating word frequency and predictability effects in reading: Evidence from coregistration of eye movements and EEG.
    Kretzschmar F; Schlesewsky M; Staub A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1648-62. PubMed ID: 26010829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: analyses and review.
    Dimigen O; Sommer W; Hohlfeld A; Jacobs AM; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Nov; 140(4):552-72. PubMed ID: 21744985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of reading comprehension and launch site on frequency-predictability interactions during paragraph reading.
    Whitford V; Titone D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1151-65. PubMed ID: 24205888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hemispheric asymmetry in interpreting novel literal language: an event-related potential study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Apr; 51(5):907-21. PubMed ID: 23376053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synchronizing timelines: relations between fixation durations and N400 amplitudes during sentence reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R
    Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 1155():147-62. PubMed ID: 17499223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting the incremental effects of context on word processing: Evidence from single-word event-related brain potentials.
    Payne BR; Lee CL; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Nov; 52(11):1456-69. PubMed ID: 26311477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Importance of Reading Naturally: Evidence From Combined Recordings of Eye Movements and Electric Brain Potentials.
    Metzner P; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S; Rösler F
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6():1232-1263. PubMed ID: 27307404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during reading.
    Dambacher M; Kliegl R; Hofmann M; Jacobs AM
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):89-103. PubMed ID: 16545344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictability effect on N400 reflects the severity of reading comprehension deficits in aphasia.
    Chang CT; Lee CY; Chou CJ; Fuh JL; Wu HC
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jan; 81():117-128. PubMed ID: 26686551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Right visual field advantage in parafoveal processing: evidence from eye-fixation-related potentials.
    Simola J; Holmqvist K; Lindgren M
    Brain Lang; 2009 Nov; 111(2):101-13. PubMed ID: 19782390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in reading.
    Staub A; Goddard K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):110-127. PubMed ID: 29648870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eye movements during reading and topic scanning: effects of word frequency.
    White SJ; Warrington KL; McGowan VA; Paterson KB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Feb; 41(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 25528014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Time for prediction? The effect of presentation rate on predictive sentence comprehension during word-by-word reading.
    Wlotko EW; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():20-32. PubMed ID: 25987437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds.
    Ferguson HJ; Sanford AJ; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2008 Oct; 1236():113-25. PubMed ID: 18722356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictability's aftermath: Downstream consequences of word predictability as revealed by repetition effects.
    Rommers J; Federmeier KD
    Cortex; 2018 Apr; 101():16-30. PubMed ID: 29414458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Brain responses to world knowledge violations: a comparison of stimulus- and fixation-triggered event-related potentials and neural oscillations.
    Metzner P; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S; Rösler F
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):1017-28. PubMed ID: 25269112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task effects on eye movements during reading.
    Kaakinen JK; Hyönä J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 20854008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of character-based knowledge in online narrative comprehension: evidence from eye movements and ERPs.
    Filik R; Leuthold H
    Brain Res; 2013 Apr; 1506():94-104. PubMed ID: 23419895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.