These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26011788)

  • 1. Eyewitness identification across the life span: A meta-analysis of age differences.
    Fitzgerald RJ; Price HL
    Psychol Bull; 2015 Nov; 141(6):1228-65. PubMed ID: 26011788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A signal-detection analysis of eyewitness identification across the adult lifespan.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Wixted JT; Maylor EA
    Psychol Aging; 2017 May; 32(3):243-258. PubMed ID: 28504536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unfair Lineups Make Witnesses More Likely to Confuse Innocent and Guilty Suspects.
    Colloff MF; Wade KA; Strange D
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Sep; 27(9):1227-39. PubMed ID: 27458070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating lineup fairness: Variations across methods and measures.
    Mansour JK; Beaudry JL; Kalmet N; Bertrand MI; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2017 Feb; 41(1):103-115. PubMed ID: 27685644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Identification accuracy of children versus adults: a meta-analysis.
    Pozzulo JD; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 1998 Oct; 22(5):549-70. PubMed ID: 9833566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: people are better with their own age.
    Wright DB; Stroud JN
    Law Hum Behav; 2002 Dec; 26(6):641-54. PubMed ID: 12508699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring lineup fairness from eyewitness identification data using a multinomial processing tree model.
    Menne NM; Winter K; Bell R; Buchner A
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6290. PubMed ID: 37072473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mistaken eyewitness identification rates increase when either witnessing or testing conditions get worse.
    Smith AM; Wilford MM; Quigley-McBride A; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 43(4):358-368. PubMed ID: 31144829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments.
    Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ
    Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy.
    Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The importance of decision bias for predicting eyewitness lineup choices: toward a Lineup Skills Test.
    Baldassari MJ; Kantner J; Lindsay DS
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2019 Jan; 4(1):2. PubMed ID: 30693377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The information gained from witnesses' responses to an initial "blank" lineup.
    Palmer MA; Brewer N; Weber N
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):439-47. PubMed ID: 22468758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Police lineups of the future?
    Brewer N; Weber N; Guerin N
    Am Psychol; 2020 Jan; 75(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 30998024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison.
    Steblay N; Dysart J; Fulero S; Lindsay RC
    Law Hum Behav; 2003 Oct; 27(5):523-40. PubMed ID: 14593796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. On the diagnosticity of multiple-witness identifications.
    Clark SE; Wells GL
    Law Hum Behav; 2008 Oct; 32(5):406-22. PubMed ID: 18095147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backloading in the sequential lineup prevents within-lineup criterion shifts that undermine eyewitness identification performance.
    Horry R; Palmer MA; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):346-60. PubMed ID: 22924858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis.
    Wixted JT; Wells GL
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2017 May; 18(1):10-65. PubMed ID: 28395650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring the effects of age and delay on children's person identifications: verbal descriptions, lineup performance, and the influence of wildcards.
    Karageorge A; Zajac R
    Br J Psychol; 2011 May; 102(2):161-83. PubMed ID: 21492140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probative value of absolute and relative judgments in eyewitness identification.
    Clark SE; Erickson MA; Breneman J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Oct; 35(5):364-80. PubMed ID: 20953683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.