234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26011923)
1. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting labor induction success: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Londero AP; Schmitz R; Bertozzi S; Driul L; Fruscalzo A
J Perinat Med; 2016 Mar; 44(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 26011923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usefulness of elastography in predicting the outcome of Foley catheter labour induction.
Wozniak S; Czuczwar P; Szkodziak P; Paszkowski T
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Jun; 55(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 26044410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.
Lu J; Cheng YKY; Ho SYS; Sahota DS; Hui LL; Poon LC; Leung TY
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jan; 99(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 31691266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Elastography of cervix to predict delay from induction to delivery].
Sonnier L; Bouhanna P; Arnou C; Rozenberg P
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Dec; 42(12):827-31. PubMed ID: 25458805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative elastography of the cervix for predicting labor induction success.
Fruscalzo A; Londero AP; Fröhlich C; Meyer-Wittkopf M; Schmitz R
Ultraschall Med; 2015 Feb; 36(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 24557633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Successful induction of labor: prediction by preinduction cervical length, angle of progression and cervical elastography.
Pereira S; Frick AP; Poon LC; Zamprakou A; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Oct; 44(4):468-75. PubMed ID: 24832011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic accuracy of pre-induction cervical elastography, volume, length, and uterocervical angle for the prediction of successful induction of labor with dinoprostone.
İleri A; Yıldırım Karaca S; Gölbaşı H; Adıyeke M; Budak A; Özer M; İleri H; Biçer M; Şenkaya AR; Arı SA; Çeliker Tosun Ö; Karaca İ
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2023 Oct; 308(4):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 37210702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting labor induction success by cervical funneling in uncomplicated pregnancies.
Kim YN; Kwon JY; Kim EH
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Jul; 46(7):1077-1083. PubMed ID: 32390283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic accuracy of cervical elastography in predicting preterm delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang B; Zhang Y; Chen S; Xiang X; Wen J; Yi M; He B; Hu B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Jul; 98(29):e16449. PubMed ID: 31335700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging analysis of cervical elastography for prediction of successful induction of labor at term.
Hwang HS; Sohn IS; Kwon HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jun; 32(6):937-46. PubMed ID: 23716514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative sonoelastography of the uterine cervix prior to induction of labor as a predictor of cervical dilation time.
Hee L; Rasmussen CK; Schlütter JM; Sandager P; Uldbjerg N
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 24702544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Elastography in the examination of the uterine cervix before labor induction].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Pankrac Z
Ginekol Pol; 2010 Oct; 81(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 21117304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of posterior cervical angle and cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
Al-Adwy AM; Sobh SM; Belal DS; Omran EF; Hassan A; Saad AH; Afifi MM; Nada AM
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2018 Apr; 141(1):102-107. PubMed ID: 29224196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
