These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26011923)

  • 21. Comparison of transvaginal sonographic cervical length measurement and Bishop score for predicting labour induction outcomes.
    Vince K; Poljičanin T; Matijević R
    J Perinat Med; 2022 Nov; 50(9):1198-1202. PubMed ID: 35654131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Elastography of the uterine cervix: implications for success of induction of labor.
    Swiatkowska-Freund M; Preis K
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Jul; 38(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21484905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can Transvaginal Cervical Elastography predict the success of induction of labor with oxytocin?
    Halilzade I; Halilzade Mİ; Sert ÜY; Alkan M; Keskin HL
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2023 Aug; 227(4):277-280. PubMed ID: 37279798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive value of cervical length by ultrasound and cervical strain elastography in labor induction at term.
    Zhou Y; Jin N; Chen Q; Lv M; Jiang Y; Chen Y; Xi F; Yang M; Zhao B; Huang H; Luo Q
    J Int Med Res; 2021 Feb; 49(2):300060520985338. PubMed ID: 33557664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transvaginal sonographic assessment of cervical length and wedging for predicting outcome of labor induction at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Verhoeven CJ; Opmeer BC; Oei SG; Latour V; van der Post JA; Mol BW
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Nov; 42(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 23533137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations.
    Fruscalzo A; Mazza E; Feltovich H; Schmitz R
    J Med Ultrason (2001); 2016 Oct; 43(4):493-504. PubMed ID: 27259500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Digital and transvaginal ultrasound cervical assessment for prediction of successful labor induction.
    Tanir HM; Sener T; Yildiz Z
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 17920604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ultrasound cervical length measurement in prediction of labor induction outcome.
    Kehila M; Abouda HS; Sahbi K; Cheour H; Chanoufi MB
    J Neonatal Perinatal Med; 2016 May; 9(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 27197935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Value of Bishop score and ultrasound cervical length measurement in the prediction of cesarean delivery.
    Cubal A; Carvalho J; Ferreira MJ; Rodrigues G; Carmo OD
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1391-6. PubMed ID: 23815073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Transvaginal ultrasound assessment of the cervix and digital examination before labor induction].
    Gomes F; Ramalho C; Machado AP; Calado E; Cardoso F; Montenegro N
    Acta Med Port; 2006; 19(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 17187711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of elastosonography and digital examination of cervix for consistency to predict successful vaginal delivery after induction of labor with oxytocin.
    Gultekin S; Gultekin IB; Icer B; Yilmaz E; Alkan A; Kucukozkan T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(23):2795-2799. PubMed ID: 27868465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Prediction of failed labor induction in parous women at term: role of previous obstetric history, digital examination and sonographic measurement of cervical length.
    Park KH; Hong JS; Shin DM; Kang WS
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2009 Apr; 35(2):301-6. PubMed ID: 19708177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
    Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
    Bueno B; San-Frutos L; Salazar F; Pérez-Medina T; Engels V; Archilla B; Izquierdo F; Bajo J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor.
    Yang SH; Roh CR; Kim JH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Mar; 23(3):375-82, quiz 384-5. PubMed ID: 15055785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fetal fibronectin is more valuable than ultrasonographic examination of the cervix or Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor.
    Uygur D; Ozgu-Erdinc AS; Deveer R; Aytan H; Mungan MT
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 55(1):94-7. PubMed ID: 26927257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.