These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2601312)

  • 1. Comfortable loudness level: stimulus effects, long-term reliability, and predictability.
    Cox RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):816-28. PubMed ID: 2601312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Relation between comfortable loudness and maximal speech intelligibility in children with sensorineural hearing loss].
    Belov IM; Kuks EN; Poliakova SK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1992; (3):6-9. PubMed ID: 1523777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The contour test of loudness perception.
    Cox RM; Alexander GC; Taylor IM; Gray GA
    Ear Hear; 1997 Oct; 18(5):388-400. PubMed ID: 9360862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of bandwidth and stimulus type on most comfortable loudness levels of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Byrne D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):484-93. PubMed ID: 3745681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An acoustic reflex technique of establishing hearing aid settings.
    Keith RW
    J Am Aud Soc; 1979; 5(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Various uncomfortable loudness thresholds, their correlation and use in general practice].
    Brügel FJ; Schorn K
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Nov; 71(11):572-5. PubMed ID: 1463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Speech audiometry with logatomes].
    Welge-Lüssen A; Hauser R; Erdmann J; Schwob C; Probst R
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1997 Feb; 76(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 9172631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comfortable loudness levels for speech: effects of signal-to-noise ratios and instructions.
    Beattie RC; Himes BE
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):213-29. PubMed ID: 6545540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS; Payton KL; Braida LD
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B Canal Phone earphones.
    Henry JA; Flick CL; Gilbert A; Ellingson RM; Fausti SA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 14582529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners.
    Johnson E; Ricketts T; Hornsby B
    Int J Audiol; 2009; 48(6):353-62. PubMed ID: 19925343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships among speech threshold, loudness discomfort, comfortable loudness, and PB max in the elderly hearing impaired.
    Beattie RC; Warren VG
    Am J Otol; 1982 Apr; 3(4):353-8. PubMed ID: 7081412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Evaluation of a transient noise reduction strategy on the loudness perception and sound quality].
    Liu H; Zhang H; Chen X; Wu Y; Kong Y; Wang S; Li J
    Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 24(19):886-9. PubMed ID: 21174750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
    Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
    J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-time multiband dynamic compression and noise reduction for binaural hearing aids.
    Kollmeier B; Peissig J; Hohmann V
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 8263832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.