These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2601314)

  • 1. Speech rate reduction and "nasality" in normal speakers.
    Brancewicz TM; Reich AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1989 Dec; 32(4):837-48. PubMed ID: 2601314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of changes in speaking rate on nasal airflow and the perception of nasality.
    Goberman AM; Selby JC; Gilbert HR
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2001; 53(4):222-30. PubMed ID: 11385281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual evaluation of hypernasality compared to HONC measures: the role of experience.
    Laczi E; Sussman JE; Stathopoulos ET; Huber J
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2005 Mar; 42(2):202-11. PubMed ID: 15748113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of the intentional voice quality on the impression of female speaker.
    Lukkarila P; Laukkanen AM; Palo P
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2012 Dec; 37(4):158-66. PubMed ID: 22616785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vibratory and perceptual measurement of resonant voice.
    Yiu EM; Chen FC; Lo G; Pang G
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):675.e13-9. PubMed ID: 22633329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Voice low tone to high tone ratio, nasalance, and nasality ratings in connected speech of native Mandarin speakers: a pilot study.
    Tsai YJ; Wang CP; Lee GS
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2012 Jul; 49(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 21740178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correspondence between an accelerometric nasal/voice amplitude ratio and listeners' direct magnitude estimations of hypernasality.
    Redenbaugh MA; Reich AR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 28(2):273-81. PubMed ID: 4010257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of feedback filtering on nasalization and self-perception of nasality.
    Burzynski CM; Starr CD
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Dec; 28(4):585-8. PubMed ID: 4087893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability and validity of nasality ratings between a monolingual and bilingual listener for speech samples from English-Spanish-Speaking children.
    Watterson T; Lewis KE; Murdock T; Cordero KN
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 24157638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between perceptual assessments of nasality and nasalance scores.
    Brunnegård K; Lohmander A; van Doorn J
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(5):556-66. PubMed ID: 22938066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of Voice Focus Adjustments on Oral-Nasal Balance in Speech and Song.
    Santoni C; de Boer G; Thaut M; Bressmann T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2020; 72(5):351-362. PubMed ID: 31434082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Nasometer and listener judgments of nasality in the assessment of velopharyngeal function after pharyngeal flap surgery.
    Nellis JL; Neiman GS; Lehman JA
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1992 Mar; 29(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 1571349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nasometric values for normal nasal resonance in the speech of young Flemish adults.
    Van Lierde KM; Wuyts FL; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2001 Mar; 38(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 11294538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vocal tremor during sustained phonation compared with sentence context.
    Lederle A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J; Finnegan E
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):668.e1-9. PubMed ID: 22521323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of levels and types of experience on judgment of synthesized voice quality.
    Sofranko JL; Prosek RA
    J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 24119637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships between intra-speaker variation in aerodynamic measures of voice production and variation in SPL across repeated recordings.
    Holmberg EB; Hillman RE; Perkell JS; Gress C
    J Speech Hear Res; 1994 Jun; 37(3):484-95. PubMed ID: 8084180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aerodynamic Characteristics of Syllable and Sentence Productions in Normal Speakers.
    Thiel C; Yang J; Crawley B; Krishna P; Murry T
    J Voice; 2019 May; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 29326024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral- and cepstral-based measures during continuous speech: capacity to distinguish dysphonia and consistency within a speaker.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Hahn YC
    J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):e223-32. PubMed ID: 20971612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
    Vogel AP; Wardrop MI; Folker JE; Synofzik M; Corben LA; Delatycki MB; Awan SN
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Changes in nasal resonance following septoplasty in adults: Acoustic and perceptual characteristics.
    Liapi A; Hirani S; Rubin J
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2016 Oct; 41(3):93-100. PubMed ID: 25842965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.