905 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26013150)
1. What Risk Factors Are Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in US Army Rangers? A Prospective Prognostic Study.
Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Butler RJ; Goffar SL; Kiesel KB; Rhon DI; Williamson JN; Plisky PJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Sep; 473(9):2948-58. PubMed ID: 26013150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of Risk Factors Prospectively Associated With Musculoskeletal Injury in a Warrior Athlete Population.
Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Goffar SL; Kiesel K; Butler RJ; Rhon DI; Plisky PJ
Sports Health; 2020; 12(6):564-572. PubMed ID: 32134698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Developing predictive models for return to work using the Military Power, Performance and Prevention (MP3) musculoskeletal injury risk algorithm: a study protocol for an injury risk assessment programme.
Rhon DI; Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Goffar SL; Kiesel K; Plisky PP
Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 24(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 27884941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Extreme conditioning programs and injury risk in a US Army Brigade Combat Team.
Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; McNulty V; Jones BH
US Army Med Dep J; 2013; ():36-47. PubMed ID: 24146241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of Injuries and Injury Types in Army Basic Training, Infantry, Armor, and Cavalry Trainees Using a Common Fitness Screen.
Sefton JM; Lohse KR; McAdam JS
J Athl Train; 2016 Nov; 51(11):849-857. PubMed ID: 28068160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Functional Movement Screen and Injury Risk: Association and Predictive Value in Active Men.
Bushman TT; Grier TL; Canham-Chervak M; Anderson MK; North WJ; Jones BH
Am J Sports Med; 2016 Feb; 44(2):297-304. PubMed ID: 26657573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can a Psychologic Profile Predict Successful Return to Full Duty After a Musculoskeletal Injury?
Greenlee TA; Bullock G; Teyhen DS; Rhon DI
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 482(4):617-629. PubMed ID: 38112301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Musculoskeletal Injuries and United States Army Readiness Part I: Overview of Injuries and their Strategic Impact.
Molloy JM; Pendergrass TL; Lee IE; Chervak MC; Hauret KG; Rhon DI
Mil Med; 2020 Sep; 185(9-10):e1461-e1471. PubMed ID: 32175566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic potential of body composition indices in detecting risk of musculoskeletal injury in army officer cadet profiles.
Havenetidis K; Paxinos T; Kardaris D; Bissas A
Phys Sportsmed; 2017 May; 45(2):114-119. PubMed ID: 28287328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Role of Gender and Physical Performance on Injuries: An Army Study.
Anderson MK; Grier T; Dada EO; Canham-Chervak M; Jones BH
Am J Prev Med; 2017 May; 52(5):e131-e138. PubMed ID: 28012810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors of Temporary Profile Days Among U.S. Army Active Duty Soldiers.
Taylor-Clark TM; Loan LA; Swiger PA; Hearld LR; Li P; Patrician PA
Mil Med; 2023 May; 188(5-6):e1214-e1223. PubMed ID: 35059717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors associated with higher body fat in US Army female soldiers.
Anderson MK; Grier T; Canham-Chervak M; Bushman TT; Jones BH
US Army Med Dep J; 2014; ():75-82. PubMed ID: 24706247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of a Novel Field Expedient Musculoskeletal Readiness Screening Tool in an Army Basic Training Population.
Hearn D; Rhon D; Goss D; Thelen M
Mil Med; 2017 Jul; 182(7):e1862-e1868. PubMed ID: 28810983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting Upper Quadrant Musculoskeletal Injuries in the Military: A Cohort Study.
Campbell KE; Parent EC; Crumback DJ; Hebert JS
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2022 Feb; 54(2):337-344. PubMed ID: 34559726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) Scores and Demographics of US Army Pre-Ranger Candidates.
Davis JD; Orr R; Knapik JJ; Harris D
Mil Med; 2020 Jun; 185(5-6):e788-e794. PubMed ID: 31819968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Musculoskeletal Injuries and United States Army Readiness. Part II: Management Challenges and Risk Mitigation Initiatives.
Molloy JM; Pendergrass TL; Lee IE; Hauret KG; Chervak MC; Rhon DI
Mil Med; 2020 Sep; 185(9-10):e1472-e1480. PubMed ID: 32107561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of Athletic Movement Tests that Predict Injury Risk in a Military Population: Development of Normative Data.
Teyhen DS; Shaffer SW; Butler RJ; Goffar SL; Kiesel KB; Rhon DI; Boyles RE; McMillian DJ; Williamson JN; Plisky PJ
Mil Med; 2016 Oct; 181(10):1324-1334. PubMed ID: 27753571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical prediction of musculoskeletal-related "medically not ready" for combat duty statuses among active duty U.S. army soldiers.
Nelson DA; Kurina LM
Mil Med; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1365-72. PubMed ID: 24306021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aetiology and risk factors of musculoskeletal disorders in physically active conscripts: a follow-up study in the Finnish Defence Forces.
Taanila H; Suni J; Pihlajamäki H; Mattila VM; Ohrankämmen O; Vuorinen P; Parkkari J
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2010 Jul; 11():146. PubMed ID: 20602765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Functional Movement Assessments Are Not Associated with Risk of Injury During Military Basic Training.
de la Motte SJ; Clifton DR; Gribbin TC; Beutler AI; Deuster PA
Mil Med; 2019 Dec; 184(11-12):e773-e780. PubMed ID: 31125066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
